Quick verdict: AAPL vs MSFT in 2026

Based on a comprehensive review of their fundamentals, Microsoft (MSFT) appears to hold a stronger overall edge compared to Apple (AAPL) as of early 2026. MSFT demonstrates superior performance in growth momentum, profitability margins, and enjoys more robust analyst sentiment, including significantly higher price target upside. While Apple presents a slightly more attractive P/E valuation, Microsoft leads across key metrics for long-term potential, though neither is considered undervalued by discounted cash flow models. This is not investment advice.

AAPL vs MSFT: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of AAPL and MSFT across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-03-25.

AAPL vs MSFT valuation comparison

The AAPL vs MSFT valuation presents a mixed picture depending on the metric. Apple currently trades at a P/E ratio of 34.09x, which is marginally lower than Microsoft’s P/E of 36.31x, suggesting Apple is slightly cheaper on an earnings multiple basis. However, when examining the price-to-book (P/B) ratio, Microsoft appears significantly more attractive at 10.76x compared to Apple’s notably higher P/B of 51.79x. This disparity often reflects differences in asset intensity and how each company generates its earnings, with Apple’s higher P/B potentially indicating a greater reliance on intangible assets or investor perception of future growth not fully captured by book value.

Delving into discounted cash flow (DCF) models for AAPL vs MSFT valuation, neither stock appears to offer a margin of safety based on today’s prices. Apple’s current price of $253.57001 is estimated to be 38.5% above its DCF fair value of $155.9. Microsoft, while also trading above its DCF fair value, shows a smaller discrepancy, with its current price of $370.53 being 14.7% higher than its DCF estimate of $316.22. Therefore, while both are considered overvalued by their respective DCF analyses, Microsoft’s current price exhibits less implied overvaluation. Overall, while Apple has a slightly lower P/E, Microsoft shows better value on P/B and a less stark deviation from its DCF valuation, making it arguably the less expensive option based on a broader valuation perspective.

AAPL vs MSFT growth comparison

When comparing AAPL vs MSFT growth trajectories, Microsoft clearly demonstrates stronger top-line momentum. Microsoft reported a year-over-year revenue growth of an impressive 14.9%, nearly double Apple’s revenue growth of 6.4%. This significant difference highlights Microsoft’s ability to expand its revenue base at a much faster pace, likely driven by its diverse portfolio including cloud services (Azure), enterprise software, and gaming. Apple, despite its massive scale, is experiencing more modest growth, typical for a company of its size largely reliant on hardware cycles and a mature services segment.

The superior growth for Microsoft isn’t just limited to revenue, but also impacts its operational efficiency and potential for future expansion. While explicit forward growth estimates are not provided, Microsoft’s higher current revenue growth, combined with its robust EBITDA margin of 56.85% compared to Apple’s 34.7%, suggests a business model that is both expanding rapidly and highly profitable. This indicates stronger momentum for MSFT, pointing towards greater potential for earnings acceleration and market share gains in the near to medium term. The divergence in growth rates indicates that MSFT holds a compelling advantage for investors prioritizing growth in their portfolio.

AAPL vs MSFT profitability

Examining the profitability of AAPL vs MSFT reveals a clear leader in operational efficiency. Microsoft boasts a superior net profit margin of 36.15%, significantly higher than Apple’s 26.92%. This indicates that for every dollar of revenue, Microsoft retains a larger portion as profit, reflecting its high-margin software and cloud-based services business model. Both companies report a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0%, which is an unusual figure for established, profitable companies and suggests either a specific accounting treatment or a data anomaly. Ignoring the ROE given its 0% value for both, Microsoft’s higher net margin still paints a picture of stronger profitability from core operations.

While Microsoft leads in net margins, Apple demonstrates a slightly better Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield. Apple’s FCF yield stands at 3.31%, compared to Microsoft’s 2.81%. A higher FCF yield suggests that Apple generates more free cash flow relative to its market capitalization, which can be attractive for investors looking for companies that efficiently convert profits into cash available for dividends, share buybacks, or debt reduction. However, given Microsoft’s significantly higher EBITDA margin (56.85% vs 34.7%), it generally generates more cash from its operations before accounting for non-cash expenses, demonstrating a more inherently cash-generative business model at the operational level, even if Apple’s FCF yield is slightly higher.

Analyst ratings: AAPL vs MSFT

Analysts clearly show a stronger preference for Microsoft when comparing AAPL vs MSFT. A substantial 79.5% of analysts covering Microsoft currently rate it as a “Buy,” significantly higher than the 63.3% “Buy” ratings for Apple. While both companies have a consensus rating of “Buy,” the higher percentage for MSFT indicates greater confidence among the analyst community regarding its future prospects and potential for outperformance. This difference, derived from 78 analysts for MSFT versus 109 for AAPL, suggests a broader and more emphatic positive sentiment towards Microsoft.

Furthermore, the projected upside for MSFT stock is considerably more attractive. Analysts have set a consensus price target of $583.67 for Microsoft, representing a remarkable potential upside of +57.5% from its current price of $370.53. In contrast, Apple’s consensus price target is $316.36, indicating a more modest upside of +24.8% from its current price of $253.57001. This substantial difference in target upside unequivocally points to Microsoft as the analysts’ preferred stock for potential price appreciation in the coming period.

Should I buy AAPL or MSFT stock in 2026?

For growth-oriented investors asking “should I buy AAPL or MSFT stock” in 2026, Microsoft appears to be the more compelling choice. With a robust year-over-year revenue growth of 14.9% compared to Apple’s 6.4%, MSFT demonstrates a stronger growth trajectory and momentum, fueled by its leading position in cloud computing and enterprise software. Analysts also project significantly higher upside potential for Microsoft, further solidifying its appeal for those seeking capital appreciation driven by rapid expansion.

When considering “aapl vs msft fundamentals and valuation” for value investors, the decision is nuanced. Apple boasts a slightly lower P/E ratio of 34.09x versus Microsoft’s 36.31x, which might suggest it’s cheaper on an earnings basis. However, Microsoft’s P/B ratio of 10.76x is substantially lower than Apple’s 51.79x. Moreover, Microsoft’s current price is less overvalued by its DCF model (-14.7% vs -38.5% for Apple). Therefore, for value investors looking beyond just P/E, Microsoft might present a more justifiable entry point despite its higher P/E, or at least less relative overvaluation.

For income-focused investors, the choice between AAPL and MSFT also leans towards Microsoft. Microsoft offers a dividend yield of 0.65%, which is notably higher than Apple’s 0.4%. While neither stock is considered a high-yield dividend play, Microsoft provides a marginally better passive income stream. Furthermore, Microsoft’s stronger free cash flow generation and lower debt-to-equity ratio (0.33x vs 1.52x for Apple) suggest a potentially more sustainable and growing dividend payout in the long term. This is not investment advice.

More AAPL and MSFT comparisons

AAPL full stock analysis · MSFT full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: AAPL vs MSFT