Quick verdict: AA vs EMN in 2026

Overall, Eastman Chemical (EMN) appears to have a stronger investment profile according to a comprehensive review of its fundamentals and analyst sentiment for 2026. Alcoa (AA) shows an edge in revenue growth and net margins, while EMN is favored by analysts, offers superior value metrics, and has significantly more upside potential based on target prices and DCF analysis. For investors considering which stock to buy in 2026, EMN presents a more compelling blend of current valuation and future outlook, though AA’s growth momentum in revenue cannot be ignored. Not investment advice.

AA vs EMN: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of AA and EMN across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-04-09.

AA vs EMN valuation comparison

When comparing AA vs EMN valuation, investors will find distinct differences as of 2026-04-09. Alcoa (AA) trades at a P/E ratio of 16.71x, which is slightly lower than Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) at 17.56x, suggesting AA is marginally cheaper on an earnings basis. However, a deeper dive into other valuation metrics reveals a more nuanced picture. AA’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio stands at 3.13x, significantly higher than EMN’s 1.4x, indicating that EMN’s assets are valued more attractively by the market relative to its book value.

Perhaps the most striking difference in the AA vs EMN valuation lies in their Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analyses. AA’s DCF suggests a considerable overvaluation, with a projected downside of -69.3% from its current price of $73.5401, indicating a fair value of $22.55. In stark contrast, EMN’s DCF points to an undervaluation, with an upside of +18.7% from its $73.02 price, implying a fair value of $86.69. This substantial divergence suggests that from a DCF perspective, EMN is significantly cheaper and offers greater potential for appreciation compared to AA. Therefore, for value-focused investors, EMN appears to be the more compelling option given its lower P/B and positive DCF upside.

AA vs EMN growth comparison

Analyzing the AA vs EMN growth comparison provides insights into each company’s recent performance and momentum. Alcoa (AA) reported a positive year-over-year revenue growth of 4.5%, demonstrating consistent demand for its products despite the cyclical nature of the basic materials sector. With total revenue at $12.74 billion, AA is also a larger company by revenue compared to EMN. This positive growth rate suggests some underlying strength and potential for continued expansion, which could appeal to growth-oriented investors looking at AA vs EMN stock comparison 2026.

Conversely, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) experienced a revenue decline of -6.7% year-over-year, with total revenue standing at $8.75 billion. This negative growth indicates headwinds or challenges in its operational environment over the past year. While EMN has a slightly better EBITDA margin at 14.83% compared to AA’s 14.64%, the declining top-line revenue might raise concerns about its immediate growth trajectory. Consequently, for investors prioritizing a company with recent positive revenue momentum, AA clearly has stronger growth momentum based on the provided data, outperforming EMN in this key area.

AA vs EMN profitability

In terms of AA vs EMN profitability, both companies exhibit different strengths. Alcoa (AA) demonstrates a superior net margin of 9.01%, significantly higher than Eastman Chemical Company’s (EMN) 5.42%. This indicates that AA is more efficient at converting its revenue into net income, suggesting better cost management or stronger pricing power within its operations. While both companies have N/A% for Return on Equity (ROE), making a direct comparison difficult on that metric, AA’s higher net margin is a strong indicator of its financial health and operational efficiency.

However, when it comes to cash generation, EMN takes the lead with a Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of 5.09%, which is notably higher than AA’s 2.92%. A higher FCF yield typically suggests that EMN is generating more cash relative to its market capitalization, which can be attractive for investors looking for companies that can fund operations, repay debt, or return capital to shareholders. Therefore, while AA boasts a healthier net margin, EMN’s stronger FCF yield suggests it generates more free cash, making it potentially more appealing for investors prioritizing robust cash flow when considering aa vs emn fundamentals and valuation.

Analyst ratings: AA vs EMN

The analyst ratings offer a critical perspective on which company the professional community believes has better prospects. For Alcoa (AA), 42 analysts cover the stock, with 50.0% issuing a ‘Buy’ rating. The consensus among these analysts is also ‘Buy’. However, their average target price for AA is $53.2, which represents a significant downside of -27.7% from its current price of $73.5401. This suggests that while analysts generally see AA as a ‘Buy’, they anticipate a price correction downwards, which is a crucial factor for potential investors considering aa vs emn stock comparison 2026.

In contrast, Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) is covered by 35 analysts, and a higher percentage, 57.1%, recommend a ‘Buy’. EMN also carries a ‘Buy’ consensus. More importantly, the average analyst target price for EMN is $73.6, which implies a modest upside of +0.8% from its current price of $73.02. This indicates that analysts perceive EMN as fairly valued with slight room for appreciation, contrasting sharply with AA’s projected decline. Based on these numbers, analysts clearly prefer EMN, not only with a higher percentage of buy ratings but also with a positive price target upside, making it the more favored stock by the analyst community.

Should I buy AA or EMN stock in 2026?

Deciding whether should I buy AA or EMN stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s specific objectives and risk tolerance. For growth-oriented investors, Alcoa (AA) might initially appear more attractive due to its positive year-over-year revenue growth of 4.5%. This indicates a company that is currently expanding its top line, unlike Eastman Chemical (EMN) which reported a -6.7% revenue decline. However, despite AA’s revenue growth, the substantial negative DCF upside of -69.3% and a consensus analyst target price of -27.7% suggest that this growth may already be priced in, or even overvalued, according to expert models.

For value investors, the picture changes significantly. When examining aa vs emn fundamentals and valuation, Eastman Chemical (EMN) presents a more compelling case. While AA has a slightly lower P/E ratio of 16.71x compared to EMN’s 17.56x, EMN’s P/B ratio of 1.4x is considerably lower than AA’s 3.13x, indicating better value on an asset basis. More critically, EMN boasts a positive DCF upside of +18.7%, suggesting it is undervalued, contrasted with AA’s deeply negative DCF. Furthermore, EMN’s free cash flow yield of 5.09% significantly surpasses AA’s 2.92%, pointing to a company that generates more cash relative to its market cap, which is a strong indicator for value.

For income-focused investors, neither AA nor EMN stands out as a high-yield dividend stock. However, EMN does offer a slightly higher dividend yield of 0.05% compared to AA’s minimal 0.01%. While these yields are very low and unlikely to be the primary driver for an investment decision, EMN still offers a marginally better return for those seeking even a modest income component. Ultimately, while AA shows positive revenue growth, EMN appears to be the stronger contender for investors seeking value, positive analyst sentiment, and better cash generation in 2026. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.

More AA and EMN comparisons

AA full stock analysis · EMN full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: AA vs EMN