Quick verdict: APO vs BN in 2026

Apollo Global Management (APO) emerges with a strong overall edge in this apo vs bn stock comparison 2026, showcasing superior performance across several key metrics. APO leads significantly in growth and valuation, while also demonstrating substantially better profitability. Although Brookfield Corporation (BN) garners a slightly higher percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings from analysts, APO offers greater potential price target and DCF upside, positioning it as the more compelling option for growth and value-oriented investors. Not investment advice.

APO vs BN: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of APO and BN across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-04-27.

APO vs BN valuation comparison

When considering APO vs BN fundamentals and valuation, Apollo Global Management (APO) presents a significantly more attractive profile. APO trades at a P/E ratio of 16.86x, which is considerably lower than Brookfield Corporation’s (BN) elevated P/E of 87.05x. This vast difference suggests that APO is trading at a more reasonable, if not undervalued, price relative to its earnings compared to BN, which appears to be substantially overvalued by this metric. While BN does have a slightly lower Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 2.38x compared to APO’s 3.24x, this small advantage is heavily outweighed by other valuation factors.

The discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis further reinforces APO’s valuation superiority, indicating a massive potential upside of +351.2% for Apollo, suggesting its intrinsic value is far above its current market price. In stark contrast, BN’s DCF analysis points to a daunting -99.7% downside, implying its current share price is drastically higher than its calculated intrinsic value. For investors focused on identifying value, APO stands out as the clear winner in the APO vs BN valuation comparison, offering substantial upside potential, whereas BN carries significant valuation risk.

APO vs BN growth comparison

In terms of growth, Apollo Global Management (APO) demonstrates considerably stronger momentum compared to Brookfield Corporation (BN). APO reported a robust year-over-year revenue growth of 16.0%, indicating a healthy expansion in its business operations and asset management activities. This positive growth trajectory suggests that Apollo is effectively scaling its operations and generating increased top-line performance, which is a critical indicator for growth-focused investors.

Conversely, Brookfield Corporation (BN) experienced a revenue decline of -11.5% year-over-year. This negative growth figure suggests BN is facing headwinds or undergoing a period of restructuring that has impacted its top line. While BN has a larger absolute revenue figure at $76.13B compared to APO’s $30.30B, the current growth rates clearly favor APO. Apollo’s consistent and positive revenue growth indicates stronger operational performance and a more favorable outlook for future earnings expansion in the apo vs bn stock comparison 2026.

APO vs BN profitability

When analyzing APO vs BN profitability, Apollo Global Management (APO) clearly surpasses Brookfield Corporation (BN) in terms of net margins and free cash flow generation. APO boasts an impressive net profit margin of 14.79%, indicating its efficiency in converting revenue into profit after all expenses. This is a significantly higher margin when compared to BN’s net margin of just 1.72%, which suggests that Brookfield retains a much smaller portion of its revenue as profit. While both companies have ‘N/A%’ for Return on Equity (ROE) in the provided data, APO’s superior net margin highlights its operational effectiveness.

Furthermore, APO exhibits a healthy Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of 7.51%, demonstrating its ability to generate substantial cash from its operations after accounting for capital expenditures. This strong FCF yield is crucial for a company’s financial health, allowing for debt reduction, dividends, or reinvestment. In contrast, BN records a negative FCF yield of -2.74%, implying that it is not generating enough cash to cover its operations and investments, a less desirable position for investors looking for strong cash flow. While BN records a higher EBITDA margin of 43.04% compared to APO’s 34.61%, its significantly lower net margin and negative FCF yield mean APO is the more profitable and cash-generative entity overall.

Analyst ratings: APO vs BN

Analysts generally view both Apollo Global Management (APO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN) positively, with both stocks holding a consensus “Buy” rating. For APO, 28 analysts cover the stock, with 85.7% issuing a “Buy” recommendation. The consensus price target for APO is $157.25, representing a potential upside of +26.5% from its current price of $124.26. This strong endorsement from a significant number of analysts suggests confidence in APO’s future performance and potential for capital appreciation.

Brookfield Corporation (BN), while also enjoying a “Buy” consensus, is covered by fewer analysts, with 9 providing ratings, 88.9% of whom recommend “Buy.” The consensus price target for BN is $54.4, indicating a projected upside of +19.6% from its current price of $45.48. While BN has a slightly higher percentage of “Buy” ratings, APO’s larger analyst coverage and higher price target upside suggest a more substantial conviction and greater potential return from the analyst community, making it a stronger contender in terms of analyst expectations for future gains.

Should I buy APO or BN stock in 2026?

For growth investors looking to add to their portfolio in 2026, Apollo Global Management (APO) appears to be the more compelling choice. With a revenue growth rate of 16.0% year-over-year, APO demonstrates strong momentum and expansion, significantly outperforming BN, which experienced a revenue decline of -11.5%. This robust growth profile suggests that APO is well-positioned to continue increasing its earnings and market share, making it an attractive option for those prioritizing top-line expansion and future potential.

Value investors considering apo vs bn fundamentals and valuation would also find APO to be the more favorable investment. APO trades at a P/E ratio of 16.86x, which is remarkably lower than BN’s P/E of 87.05x, indicating APO is currently undervalued relative to its earnings power. Furthermore, APO’s discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis points to an impressive +351.2% upside, contrasting sharply with BN’s significant -99.7% DCF downside. This makes APO a strong candidate for investors seeking stocks trading below their intrinsic value.

For income-focused investors, neither APO nor BN offer substantial dividend yields, with APO yielding 0.02% and BN yielding 0.01%. Both yields are very modest, suggesting that these companies are not primary choices for passive income generation. However, if forced to choose between the two for a marginally higher payout, APO technically has the edge. Overall, for investors wondering should i buy apo or bn stock 2026, APO’s superior growth, profitability, and valuation metrics present a more attractive investment thesis. This is not investment advice.

More APO and BN comparisons

APO full stock analysis · BN full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: APO vs BN