Quick verdict: AMG vs BEN in 2026

AMG displays a strong overall edge in this comparison, leading on key metrics for growth, value, and profitability with 8 wins to BEN’s 4. It stands out as the growth leader with significantly higher revenue expansion, while also presenting as the value leader with a lower P/E ratio and substantial DCF upside. AMG’s superior net and EBITDA margins mark it as the clear profitability leader, and it is overwhelmingly the analyst favourite with a 100% buy rating and positive price target upside, indicating it has the most potential upside. Not investment advice.

AMG vs BEN: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of AMG and BEN across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-04-29.

AMG vs BEN valuation comparison

When comparing AMG vs BEN valuation, AMG appears to offer a more compelling value proposition based on several key metrics. AMG currently trades at a P/E ratio of 11.3x, which is notably lower than BEN’s P/E of 18.78x. This suggests that investors are paying less for each dollar of earnings with AMG, indicating it might be undervalued relative to its earnings power compared to BEN. Furthermore, AMG’s intrinsic value, as indicated by its DCF valuation, suggests a significant upside of +29.3%, pointing to considerable potential for price appreciation.

In contrast, while BEN’s P/B ratio of 1.26x is lower than AMG’s 2.5x, implying a cheaper valuation relative to its book assets, its higher P/E ratio and more modest DCF upside of +11.4% suggest less room for growth based on its current earnings and future cash flow projections. Therefore, for investors prioritizing earnings-based valuation and potential intrinsic value upside, AMG presents a stronger case in the AMG vs BEN valuation comparison, despite BEN’s lower P/B.

AMG vs BEN growth comparison

In terms of growth, Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) demonstrates significantly stronger momentum compared to Franklin Resources (BEN). AMG reported an impressive year-over-year revenue growth of 19.8%, indicating robust expansion and increasing market penetration. This substantial growth rate positions AMG as a leader in its segment, suggesting effective strategies for attracting and retaining assets or clients, and potentially expanding its service offerings. Such strong top-line growth is often a precursor to sustained earnings improvements and enhanced shareholder value, marking AMG as a compelling choice for growth-oriented investors.

Conversely, Franklin Resources (BEN) shows a more modest revenue growth of 3.5% year-over-year. While positive, this rate is considerably lower than AMG’s, suggesting a slower pace of expansion or perhaps a more mature market position. When evaluating AMG vs BEN for growth potential, AMG clearly has the stronger fundamental tailwind, backed by its superior revenue trajectory and the potential for greater future earnings acceleration, particularly given its strong margins. Investors seeking dynamic companies with significant top-line expansion would likely find AMG’s growth profile more attractive.

AMG vs BEN profitability

When analyzing AMG vs BEN profitability, AMG emerges as the significantly more efficient and financially robust company. AMG boasts an impressive net margin of 30.92%, which indicates that a substantial portion of its revenue translates directly into profit. This high net margin is further complemented by an outstanding EBITDA margin of 64.42%, showcasing exceptional operational efficiency and control over its core business expenses. These strong margins suggest that AMG effectively manages its costs and generates considerable profit from its operations.

Franklin Resources (BEN), while profitable, demonstrates considerably lower margins. BEN’s net margin stands at 8.99%, which is a respectable figure but pales in comparison to AMG’s. Similarly, its EBITDA margin is 19.58%, highlighting a less efficient operational structure relative to AMG. Furthermore, AMG’s Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of 12.53% is nearly double that of BEN’s 6.11%, indicating AMG generates significantly more cash relative to its market capitalization, which can be used for reinvestment, debt reduction, or shareholder returns. While ROE data is N/A for both, AMG’s superior net and EBITDA margins, along with its higher FCF yield, firmly establish it as the more profitable entity in this AMG vs BEN comparison.

Analyst ratings: AMG vs BEN

The sentiment among financial analysts shows a clear preference for Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) over Franklin Resources (BEN). Of the 12 analysts covering AMG, an overwhelming 100.0% have issued a “Buy” rating, culminating in a strong consensus of “Buy” for the stock. Their collective price target for AMG is $331.5, which represents a potential upside of +13.3% from its current price of $292.47. This unanimous endorsement underscores a high degree of confidence in AMG’s future performance and growth prospects.

In stark contrast, Franklin Resources (BEN) receives a much less enthusiastic reception from analysts. Out of 27 analysts, only 22.2% recommend a “Buy,” leading to an overall “Hold” consensus. Furthermore, the consensus target price for BEN is $25, implying a potential downside of -15.1% from its current price of $29.46. This suggests that a significant portion of analysts foresee stagnation or even decline for BEN’s stock in the near term. For investors weighing AMG vs BEN fundamentals and valuation, the pronounced divergence in analyst sentiment provides a strong indicator of perceived risk and reward.

Should I buy AMG or BEN stock in 2026?

When considering whether should I buy AMG or BEN stock in 2026, the decision largely depends on your investment priorities, be it growth, value, or income. For growth-oriented investors, AMG presents a compelling argument. Its reported revenue growth of 19.8% year-over-year significantly outpaces BEN’s 3.5%, indicating a company with strong expansion capabilities and market traction. Coupled with its robust net margin of 30.92% and EBITDA margin of 64.42%, AMG demonstrates efficient growth that translates into superior profitability, making it an attractive option for those seeking dynamic businesses with strong momentum.

From a value perspective, AMG also holds an advantage in this AMG vs BEN stock comparison 2026. Its P/E ratio of 11.3x is substantially lower than BEN’s 18.78x, suggesting AMG might be undervalued relative to its earnings potential. The discounted cash flow (DCF) model reinforces this, projecting an impressive upside of +29.3% for AMG, far exceeding BEN’s +11.4%. While BEN has a lower P/B ratio (1.26x vs. AMG’s 2.5x), AMG’s superior profitability, growth, and DCF upside often overshadow this, presenting it as a stronger candidate for investors focused on AMG vs BEN fundamentals and valuation.

For income investors, neither stock is a prominent dividend play, but BEN technically offers a yield, albeit minimal. BEN currently provides a dividend yield of 0.04%, while AMG’s yield is 0.0%. This makes BEN the only option if a dividend is a strict requirement, even if the yield is negligible. However, for most income-focused portfolios, neither AMG nor BEN would likely be a primary choice given these low yields. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.

More AMG and BEN comparisons

AMG full stock analysis · BEN full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: AMG vs BEN