vs
PNC
Updated 2026-05-04
Comerica Incorporated (CMA) vs The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC): Stock Comparison 2026
Quick verdict: CMA vs PNC in 2026
In our detailed CMA vs PNC stock comparison for 2026, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) holds an overall edge, leading on 7 of 11 comparable metrics in our scorecard. Comerica Incorporated (CMA) demonstrates a relative edge in growth momentum with a less severe revenue decline, while PNC stands out as the value leader based on traditional P/E and P/B multiples and is also favored by analysts. CMA, however, presents a higher potential price target upside and a more favorable DCF valuation relative to its current price. Not investment advice.
Best for Value: PNC
Best for Income: Neutral
CMA vs PNC: key metrics side by side
Full side-by-side comparison of CMA and PNC across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-04.
| Metric | CMA | PNC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.80B | $31.34B |
| Revenue growth YoY | -3.9% CMA wins | -7.0% |
| Gross margin | 68.07% | 71.88% PNC wins |
| Net margin | 15.07% | 22.51% PNC wins |
| EBITDA margin | 20.61% | 27.54% PNC wins |
| ROE | N/A% | N/A% |
| FCF yield | 3.64% | 6.63% PNC wins |
| P/E ratio | 16.19x | 12.59x PNC wins |
| P/B ratio | 1.52x | 1.43x PNC wins |
| Debt / equity | 0.7x CMA wins | 1.05x |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Buy rating % | 24.2% | 47.8% PNC wins |
| Analyst consensus | Hold | Hold |
| Price target upside | +16.2% CMA wins | +14.3% |
| DCF upside | -5.9% CMA wins | -42.8% |
| FMP rating | N/A | B |
CMA vs PNC valuation comparison
When assessing the CMA vs PNC valuation for 2026, PNC generally appears more attractive based on widely used multiples. PNC trades at a P/E ratio of 12.59x, which is notably lower than CMA’s 16.19x. This suggests that investors are willing to pay less for each dollar of PNC’s earnings compared to CMA, potentially indicating a more favorable value proposition for PNC. Similarly, PNC’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 1.43x is slightly lower than CMA’s 1.52x, reinforcing the perception that PNC might be trading at a comparatively cheaper valuation relative to its tangible assets.
However, the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis presents a different angle for CMA vs PNC fundamentals and valuation. CMA’s current price of $88.67 is only 5.9% above its DCF fair value of $83.43, implying a -5.9% DCF upside (or downside relative to DCF value). In contrast, PNC’s price of $220.95 is significantly above its DCF fair value of $126.44, resulting in a substantial -42.8% DCF upside (or deviation). This suggests that while PNC looks cheaper on P/E and P/B, CMA is perceived to be much closer to its intrinsic value according to the DCF model, offering less theoretical overvaluation risk based on future cash flows. Therefore, investors prioritizing traditional multiples might lean towards PNC, while those emphasizing DCF might view CMA as having less intrinsic overvaluation.
CMA vs PNC growth comparison
In the CMA vs PNC growth comparison, both financial institutions are currently navigating a challenging revenue environment, as reflected by negative year-over-year revenue growth rates. Comerica (CMA) reported a revenue growth of -3.9%, which, while a decline, is less severe than The PNC Financial Services Group’s (PNC) revenue contraction of -7.0%. This indicates that CMA has shown relatively stronger momentum in mitigating revenue pressures compared to PNC, positioning it as having a slight edge in terms of current growth trajectory.
Despite the broader industry headwinds affecting revenue, the relative performance in revenue growth could be a key consideration for investors. CMA’s ability to limit its revenue decline to -3.9% suggests a degree of resilience or perhaps more effective strategic adjustments compared to PNC’s -7.0% decline. While neither company is currently in a growth phase, CMA’s performance implies a comparatively better position to return to positive growth when market conditions improve. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for investors evaluating `cma vs pnc earnings growth comparison` for future prospects.
CMA vs PNC profitability
When examining `cma vs pnc profitability comparison`, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) clearly demonstrates superior margins across the board compared to Comerica Incorporated (CMA). PNC boasts a net margin of 22.51%, significantly higher than CMA’s 15.07%. This indicates that PNC is more efficient at converting its revenue into net income, retaining a larger portion as profit for its shareholders. Similarly, PNC’s EBITDA margin of 27.54% surpasses CMA’s 20.61%, highlighting PNC’s greater operational efficiency before accounting for depreciation, amortization, interest, and taxes. PNC also reported a higher gross margin of 71.88% versus CMA’s 68.07%.
Furthermore, PNC also excels in generating free cash flow. PNC’s Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield stands at 6.63%, considerably higher than CMA’s 3.64%. A higher FCF yield indicates that PNC generates more cash per share relative to its share price, suggesting stronger financial health and greater flexibility for reinvestment, debt reduction, or shareholder returns. Both companies currently report “N/A%” for Return on Equity (ROE), preventing a direct comparison on this specific metric. However, based on the available data, PNC clearly generates more cash and demonstrates higher overall profitability compared to CMA, making it a stronger performer in this category.
Analyst ratings: CMA vs PNC
In terms of analyst sentiment and `cma vs pnc analyst ratings and recommendations`, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) appears to be more favored by the investment community, albeit with both stocks holding a consensus “Hold” rating. Out of 46 analysts covering PNC, 47.8% currently recommend a “Buy” rating. Their consensus price target for PNC is $252.63, suggesting an upside potential of +14.3% from its current price of $220.95. This indicates a relatively strong belief in PNC’s future performance among a significant portion of analysts.
Comerica Incorporated (CMA), on the other hand, receives “Buy” recommendations from a smaller percentage of analysts. Out of 62 analysts, 24.2% have a “Buy” rating. Despite the lower percentage of buy recommendations, CMA’s consensus price target of $103 offers a higher upside potential of +16.2% from its current price of $88.67. This suggests that while fewer analysts are outright bullish on CMA, those who are see greater room for appreciation. Overall, PNC enjoys a higher proportion of positive analyst sentiment, but CMA presents a slightly more optimistic `cma vs pnc target price comparison 2026` in terms of percentage upside.
Should I buy CMA or PNC stock in 2026?
Deciding `should i buy cma or pnc stock 2026` depends heavily on an investor’s specific priorities and risk tolerance. For growth-oriented investors, Comerica (CMA) might present a marginally more appealing prospect. While both companies are currently experiencing revenue contraction, CMA’s -3.9% year-over-year revenue growth is less negative than PNC’s -7.0%. This relative resilience could suggest better underlying operational strength or market positioning in a challenging environment. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that neither is currently in a strong growth phase, and future positive growth is an essential factor to consider for any growth-focused investment.
For value investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) generally appears to be the stronger candidate based on traditional valuation multiples. With a P/E ratio of 12.59x and a P/B ratio of 1.43x, PNC trades at a lower valuation than CMA (P/E 16.19x, P/B 1.52x). This suggests that PNC might offer more ‘value’ for each dollar of earnings or book value. However, the DCF analysis paints a nuanced picture; CMA’s -5.9% DCF upside indicates less theoretical overvaluation compared to PNC’s -42.8%. Investors should weigh whether a lower multiple or a closer proximity to DCF fair value aligns better with their definition of value.
When considering `cma vs pnc fundamentals and valuation` for income, both CMA and PNC offer a modest dividend yield of 0.03%. This identical, relatively low yield means that neither stock stands out as a superior choice purely for dividend income at this time. For investors prioritizing stability and profitability, PNC exhibits significantly higher net margins (22.51% vs. 15.07%) and EBITDA margins (27.54% vs. 20.61%), along with a stronger Free Cash Flow yield (6.63% vs. 3.64%). This indicates PNC is more efficient and generates more cash from its operations. Ultimately, the choice between CMA and PNC in 2026 hinges on whether you prioritize CMA’s less negative growth and theoretically less overvalued DCF, or PNC’s stronger profitability, lower traditional multiples, and higher analyst favorability. This is not investment advice, and investors should conduct thorough due diligence.
Alert Invest · Free Newsletter
Get alerts when top investors buy a stock!
Track when institutional investors and analysts change positions on CMA and PNC. Free, every week.
- Institutional & insider moves
- Analyst upgrades & downgrades
- 100% free — unsubscribe anytime
FAQ: CMA vs PNC
Is CMA or PNC a better stock in 2026?
Based on our comparison, PNC leads on more key metrics (7 wins vs CMA’s 4 wins). PNC trades at a lower P/E ratio of 12.59x compared to CMA’s 16.19x and has a higher percentage of “Buy” ratings from analysts (47.8% vs 24.2%). However, CMA shows less relative revenue decline and a more favorable DCF valuation compared to its current price. It’s crucial for investors to consider their individual financial goals. Not investment advice.
Which has more analyst upside — CMA or PNC?
As of 2026-05-04, CMA has a higher potential price target upside of +16.2% from its consensus target of $103, compared to PNC’s +14.3% upside from its consensus target of $252.63. Not a prediction by Alert Invest.
Which is growing faster — CMA or PNC?
CMA’s revenue growth is -3.9% YoY, while PNC’s revenue growth is -7.0% YoY. Therefore, CMA has stronger relative momentum in terms of revenue decline, contracting at a slower rate than PNC.
Which is more profitable — CMA or PNC?
PNC is more profitable, reporting a net margin of 22.51% and an EBITDA margin of 27.54%, significantly higher than CMA’s net margin of 15.07% and EBITDA margin of 20.61%. Both companies report ROE as N/A%.
Do CMA or PNC pay dividends?
Yes, both CMA and PNC pay dividends, with both stocks currently offering a dividend yield of 0.03%.
For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. Data: Financial Modeling Prep & SEC EDGAR. Always do your own research.
