Quick verdict: LNC vs MFC in 2026

Overall, Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) holds a slight edge over Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) based on a majority of the comparable metrics in this 2026 analysis. While LNC emerges as the clear leader in valuation and recent revenue growth, MFC boasts superior profitability margins, stronger free cash flow generation, and a more favorable consensus among analysts, offering higher target price upside. This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice.

LNC vs MFC: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of LNC and MFC across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-04.

LNC vs MFC valuation comparison

When conducting an LNC vs MFC valuation, Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) appears significantly cheaper across key metrics. LNC currently trades at a P/E ratio of 6.09x, which is substantially lower than Manulife Financial Corporation’s (MFC) P/E of 15.48x. This suggests that investors are paying considerably less for each dollar of LNC’s earnings compared to MFC. Similarly, LNC’s P/B ratio stands at a compelling 0.66x, indicating it trades below its book value, whereas MFC trades above at 1.76x. This further reinforces LNC’s position as the more undervalued stock based on traditional valuation multiples.

The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis also paints a dramatically different picture for the two companies. LNC shows an extraordinary implied DCF upside of +522.8%, suggesting its intrinsic value is far above its current market price. In contrast, MFC’s DCF model indicates a downside of -44.1%, implying it may be overvalued based on its projected future cash flows. Considering these factors, LNC clearly emerges as the cheaper stock from a valuation perspective, offering a potentially much larger upside for value-oriented investors, despite its smaller market capitalization of $7.17B compared to MFC’s $65.49B.

LNC vs MFC growth comparison

In the LNC vs MFC growth comparison, Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) demonstrates a positive, albeit modest, revenue growth of +1.2% year-over-year. This indicates a degree of stability and expansion in its top line. On the other hand, Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) reported a stark revenue growth of -827.4%, which represents a significant contraction in its revenue base. This considerable difference highlights LNC’s stronger recent momentum in terms of top-line expansion, suggesting it is better navigating the current market environment to maintain or grow its sales.

Despite LNC’s superior revenue growth, MFC exhibits stronger profitability margins. MFC’s net margin is 10.91% and its EBITDA margin is 12.82%, both notably higher than LNC’s net margin of 6.43% and EBITDA margin of 8.63%. While MFC’s top-line experienced a severe decline, its ability to translate sales into profit is more efficient. However, for investors prioritizing growth, LNC’s positive revenue trajectory, even with lower margins, points to a more favorable growth momentum in the current period, especially when considering the sheer magnitude of MFC’s revenue decline. Further analysis of forward estimates would be crucial to understand if MFC’s revenue decline is an anomaly or a persistent trend.

LNC vs MFC profitability

Evaluating LNC vs MFC profitability reveals that Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) generally operates with higher efficiency and generates more cash from its operations, despite its recent revenue decline. MFC boasts a net margin of 10.91% and an EBITDA margin of 12.82%. These figures are considerably stronger than Lincoln National Corporation’s (LNC) net margin of 6.43% and EBITDA margin of 8.63%. This indicates that MFC is more effective at converting its revenue into actual profit and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

Furthermore, when examining Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield, MFC significantly outperforms LNC. MFC reports a robust FCF yield of 36.02%, demonstrating its strong ability to generate cash after accounting for capital expenditures. In contrast, LNC has a negative FCF yield of -2.33%, which suggests it is consuming cash rather than generating it from its operations. Both companies have an N/A for Return on Equity (ROE), preventing a direct comparison on that specific metric. Based on net margins, EBITDA margins, and particularly FCF yield, MFC clearly generates more cash and is the more profitable entity, signaling superior operational efficiency and financial health compared to LNC.

Analyst ratings: LNC vs MFC

When considering analyst ratings for LNC vs MFC, Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) currently garners a more favorable outlook from the analyst community. Out of 14 analysts covering MFC, 57.1% have issued a “Buy” rating, contributing to a consensus rating of “Buy” for the stock. These analysts have set a consensus price target of $51, suggesting a potential upside of +30.6% from its current price of $39.06. This indicates a strong belief in MFC’s future performance and growth potential from a professional perspective.

In comparison, Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) has a less enthusiastic rating profile. With 28 analysts covering LNC, only 35.7% have given it a “Buy” rating, resulting in a consensus rating of “Hold”. The analysts’ collective price target for LNC is $43.5, which represents a more modest upside of +16.1% from its current price of $37.48. This suggests that while there is some upside potential, the broader analyst community views LNC with more caution or neutrality than MFC. Therefore, analysts clearly prefer MFC, indicating greater confidence in its near-term prospects and valuation.

Should I buy LNC or MFC stock in 2026?

Deciding whether should I buy LNC or MFC stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s specific objectives. For growth-oriented investors, LNC presents a compelling, albeit cautious, case. Lincoln National Corporation has demonstrated a positive revenue growth of +1.2% year-over-year, which, while not explosive, shows forward momentum. This stands in stark contrast to Manulife Financial Corporation’s significant revenue decline of -827.4%. Although MFC is a larger, more established entity with better operational margins, LNC’s positive top-line trend suggests it is currently managing to grow its business, which is a fundamental indicator for growth investors.

For value investors, LNC appears to be the more attractive choice. It trades at a considerably lower P/E ratio of 6.09x compared to MFC’s 15.48x, and its P/B ratio of 0.66x is also significantly lower than MFC’s 1.76x, indicating it is trading below book value. Furthermore, LNC’s DCF analysis suggests an immense upside of +522.8%, making it an exceptionally undervalued prospect if the market corrects to its intrinsic value. Conversely, MFC’s DCF indicates a -44.1% downside. These figures collectively highlight LNC as a strong candidate for investors seeking deep value in the financial services sector.

Income-focused investors will find both LNC and MFC offer modest dividend yields. LNC provides a dividend yield of 0.05%, which is slightly higher than MFC’s 0.03%. While neither stock is a high-yield play, LNC offers a marginally better return for income generation. Therefore, when considering should I buy LNC or MFC stock in 2026, LNC appeals to growth (due to positive revenue growth), value, and marginally to income investors, while MFC’s strength lies in its profitability margins and analyst favorability despite significant revenue contraction and a less attractive valuation. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.

More LNC and MFC comparisons

LNC full stock analysis · MFC full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: LNC vs MFC