Quick verdict: ADM vs GIS in 2026

General Mills (GIS) demonstrates a stronger overall financial profile and market potential compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) as of May 2026. While both face revenue declines, GIS exhibits superior margins, more attractive valuation metrics, and significant analyst-projected upside. ADM, however, is preferred by a slightly higher percentage of analysts, but GIS ultimately offers the most compelling upside. Not investment advice.

ADM vs GIS: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of ADM and GIS across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-07.

ADM vs GIS valuation comparison

When assessing the ADM vs GIS valuation in 2026, General Mills (GIS) appears significantly more attractive. GIS boasts a P/E ratio of 8.55x, which is considerably lower than ADM’s elevated P/E of 34.73x, suggesting that GIS is trading at a much more reasonable price relative to its earnings. While ADM has a slightly lower Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 1.65x compared to GIS at 2.03x, the P/E difference heavily favors GIS for value-oriented investors.

Furthermore, the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis reinforces GIS’s valuation appeal, projecting a substantial upside of +236.2%. In stark contrast, ADM’s DCF suggests an -8.5% downside from its current price. This wide disparity indicates that, based on future cash flow potential, GIS is deeply undervalued by the market, whereas ADM may be currently overvalued. Therefore, for investors prioritizing a strong valuation, GIS clearly stands out as the cheaper option.

ADM vs GIS growth comparison

In terms of growth, both Archer-Daniels-Midland and General Mills have experienced recent revenue declines, a trend that warrants careful consideration for investors looking at ADM vs GIS fundamentals in 2026. ADM reported a year-over-year revenue growth of -6.2%, indicating a more pronounced contraction in its top line. This suggests that ADM’s business segments may be facing greater headwinds or competitive pressures, leading to a significant dip in sales.

General Mills, while also showing negative growth, experienced a more moderate revenue decline of -1.9% year-over-year. This comparatively smaller contraction suggests stronger momentum for GIS, as it is better managing market challenges than ADM. Although neither company is demonstrating positive revenue growth, GIS’s lesser decline positions it as having stronger, or at least more resilient, momentum in the current environment. This trend is further supported by GIS’s superior profitability margins, which can help mitigate the impact of revenue stagnation, indicating a more robust underlying business.

ADM vs GIS profitability

Examining the profitability metrics for ADM vs GIS reveals a stark difference in operational efficiency and earnings power. General Mills (GIS) demonstrates significantly higher profitability across the board. GIS commands a net profit margin of 12.05%, which is remarkably strong, especially when compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM)’s net margin of just 1.34%. This substantial difference indicates that GIS is far more effective at converting its revenue into actual profit for shareholders.

Furthermore, GIS’s EBITDA margin stands at an impressive 16.6%, dwarfing ADM’s 4.32%. This disparity highlights GIS’s superior operational efficiency and ability to control costs before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. While both companies have N/A% for Return on Equity (ROE) in the provided data, ADM leads in Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield at 12.83% compared to GIS’s 8.84%, suggesting ADM is more efficient at generating cash relative to its market cap, despite its lower margins. However, overall, GIS generates significantly more cash from its operations, as reflected by its much higher net and EBITDA margins.

Analyst ratings: ADM vs GIS

A look at analyst ratings provides crucial insights for those wondering should I buy ADM or GIS stock 2026. ADM currently has 33.3% of analysts recommending a “Buy” out of a total of 36 analysts, with a consensus rating of “Hold.” Their collective price target for ADM is $74, which represents a -4.6% downside from its current price of $77.56. This indicates that while a third of analysts see potential, the broader consensus does not anticipate immediate capital appreciation, and the target price suggests a slight retraction.

In contrast, General Mills (GIS) has a slightly lower percentage of “Buy” ratings at 26.5% from 34 analysts, also with an overall “Hold” consensus. However, the analyst-projected price target for GIS is $46.58, presenting a significant +33.2% upside from its current price of $34.97. This strong upside potential suggests that, despite a lower percentage of outright buy recommendations, analysts believe GIS has considerably more room for stock price growth compared to ADM. Therefore, while more analysts technically recommend buying ADM, GIS offers a much more compelling price target upside according to their collective view.

Should I buy ADM or GIS stock in 2026?

For growth investors considering the ADM vs GIS stock comparison 2026, the picture is complex given both companies face revenue declines. However, GIS, with its -1.9% revenue growth, shows relatively stronger momentum than ADM’s -6.2%. While neither represents high growth, GIS’s superior margins (Net margin 12.05% vs 1.34%) could offer a more stable foundation for future growth initiatives or market recovery. Therefore, if forced to choose based on current trends and operational strength, GIS appears to be the more resilient option for those prioritizing relative growth stability.

Value investors evaluating ADM vs GIS fundamentals and valuation will likely find General Mills (GIS) to be the more attractive option. GIS trades at a significantly lower P/E ratio of 8.55x compared to ADM’s 34.73x, suggesting it is priced more favorably relative to its earnings. Moreover, GIS’s DCF analysis points to an impressive +236.2% upside, indicating substantial undervaluation, whereas ADM’s DCF shows a -8.5% downside. This compelling valuation, coupled with a higher FMP rating of A- for GIS versus B+ for ADM, makes GIS a stronger candidate for value-seeking portfolios.

For income-focused investors, the dividend yield is a key consideration. General Mills (GIS) currently offers a dividend yield of 0.07%, which is higher than Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM)’s yield of 0.03%. While both yields are modest, GIS provides a slightly better return on investment through dividends. This, combined with its stronger overall financial health and potential for capital appreciation, makes GIS the more appealing choice for investors looking for both income and potential growth in 2026. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.

More ADM and GIS comparisons

ADM full stock analysis · GIS full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: ADM vs GIS