vs
MO
Updated 2026-05-07
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) vs Altria Group, Inc. (MO): Stock Comparison 2026
Quick verdict: BUD vs MO in 2026
Overall, Altria Group, Inc. (MO) demonstrates a stronger fundamental profile, particularly in profitability and valuation metrics, while Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) offers slightly better revenue growth momentum and higher analyst price target upside. MO emerges as the clear value and margin leader, also garnering a slightly higher buy consensus from analysts. For investors evaluating “should i buy BUD or MO stock 2026”, BUD may appeal to those prioritizing potential price appreciation based on analyst targets, while MO offers superior profitability and a more attractive valuation for long-term holders. Not investment advice.
Best for Value: MO
Best for Income: MO
BUD vs MO: key metrics side by side
Full side-by-side comparison of BUD and MO across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-07.
| Metric | BUD | MO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $59.50B | $20.14B |
| Revenue growth YoY | -0.4% BUD wins | -1.5% |
| Gross margin | 55.93% | 67.84% MO wins |
| Net margin | 11.53% | 36.91% MO wins |
| EBITDA margin | 26.98% | 53.61% MO wins |
| ROE | N/A% | N/A% |
| FCF yield | 7.55% | 7.44% |
| P/E ratio | 23.1x | 14.42x MO wins |
| P/B ratio | 1.81x | -36.15x MO wins |
| Debt / equity | 0.84x | -7.66x MO wins |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.06% MO wins |
| Buy rating % | 57.8% | 61.5% MO wins |
| Analyst consensus | Buy | Buy |
| Price target upside | +10.1% BUD wins | +3.3% |
| DCF upside | +13.6% | +60.0% MO wins |
| FMP rating | B | B- |
BUD vs MO valuation comparison
When considering “bud vs mo fundamentals and valuation”, a stark contrast emerges in their P/E ratios. BUD currently trades at a P/E of 23.1x, which is considerably higher than MO’s P/E of 14.42x. This suggests that the market is willing to pay a premium for BUD’s earnings compared to MO’s, or that MO may be undervalued relative to its earnings. Furthermore, MO’s P/B ratio is notably negative at -36.15x, while BUD’s stands at 1.81x. A negative P/B ratio for MO typically indicates that its liabilities exceed its assets, making traditional P/B comparisons complex and sometimes pointing to a more leveraged capital structure or past losses that eroded equity.
Looking at intrinsic value through a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model, MO presents a significantly higher upside of +60.0% to its calculated fair value of $111.04 from its current price of $69.39. In contrast, BUD’s DCF suggests an upside of +13.6% to its fair value of $91.82 from its current price of $80.845. This substantial difference in DCF upside strongly indicates that MO is considered significantly cheaper based on future cash flow projections, offering a potentially more attractive entry point for value-oriented investors compared to BUD, despite the complexities of its P/B ratio. The “bud vs mo valuation” story leans heavily towards Altria offering better value in 2026.
BUD vs MO growth comparison
In terms of top-line expansion, neither BUD nor MO demonstrated positive revenue growth in their most recent reporting periods, reflecting challenges within their respective industries. BUD recorded a revenue growth of -0.4% year-over-year, which, while negative, still represents a less severe decline compared to MO’s revenue growth of -1.5%. This slight advantage in revenue trajectory positions BUD as having stronger, or at least less negative, momentum in sales generation heading into 2026. This modest outperformance could be a key factor for investors prioritizing even incremental signs of recovery or resilience in growth metrics.
However, when considering growth quality alongside revenue trends, MO exhibits vastly superior profitability margins that could indirectly support future growth or shareholder returns, even with declining sales. MO boasts a net margin of 36.91% and an EBITDA margin of 53.61%, which are significantly higher than BUD’s net margin of 11.53% and EBITDA margin of 26.98%. These robust margins suggest MO is far more efficient at converting revenue into profit. While forward estimates are not provided, MO’s greater operational efficiency might allow it to weather revenue declines more effectively and allocate capital to strategic initiatives, potentially fostering future growth more sustainably than BUD, which operates with tighter margins.
BUD vs MO profitability
A direct comparison of profitability metrics between BUD and MO reveals a clear leader in operational efficiency. Altria Group, Inc. (MO) commands a significantly higher net margin of 36.91% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD)’s 11.53%. This disparity highlights MO’s ability to retain a much larger portion of its revenue as net income, signaling superior cost control and pricing power within its market. Similarly, MO’s EBITDA margin stands at an impressive 53.61%, dwarfing BUD’s 26.98%. These robust margins for MO indicate a highly profitable core business operation before accounting for non-operating expenses and taxes, underscoring its financial strength.
Regarding Return on Equity (ROE), both companies currently report “N/A%”, preventing a direct comparison of how efficiently they are using shareholder equity to generate profits. However, looking at Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield, BUD shows a FCF yield of 7.55%, slightly ahead of MO’s 7.44%. While the FCF yields are very similar, MO’s substantially higher net and EBITDA margins suggest that it generates a significantly larger amount of cash from each dollar of revenue it earns, even if its FCF yield is marginally lower than BUD’s. This strong cash generation ability from operations is a key indicator of financial health and flexibility, providing resources for dividends, debt reduction, or reinvestment.
Analyst ratings: BUD vs MO
The analyst community provides valuable insights for “bud vs mo stock comparison 2026”, with both stocks receiving a consensus “Buy” rating. Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) is covered by 45 analysts, of whom 57.8% currently recommend a “Buy”. Their consensus price target for BUD is $89, representing an attractive upside potential of +10.1% from its current price of $80.845. This indicates a general optimism regarding BUD’s future performance and potential for capital appreciation according to these financial experts.
Altria Group (MO), while covered by fewer analysts (26), garners a slightly higher percentage of “Buy” ratings at 61.5%. However, the consensus price target for MO is $71.67, which implies a more modest upside of +3.3% from its current price of $69.39. While analysts show a marginally stronger preference for MO in terms of outright buy recommendations, they forecast a considerably greater percentage upside for BUD’s stock price. This suggests that while MO is generally seen as a solid buy, BUD is perceived to have more room for price growth in the near to medium term.
Should I buy BUD or MO stock in 2026?
When deciding “should I buy BUD or MO stock in 2026”, investors focused on growth should closely examine the nuanced picture. While both companies are experiencing revenue declines, BUD’s year-over-year revenue growth of -0.4% is less severe than MO’s -1.5%. This indicates BUD has slightly better momentum in managing its top-line performance, which might appeal to growth-sensitive investors, despite the overall challenging environment for both. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge that neither company is currently exhibiting positive growth, meaning “growth” in this context refers to relative resilience.
For value investors, the choice between BUD and MO becomes clearer. Altria Group (MO) appears to offer a more compelling value proposition. Its P/E ratio of 14.42x is substantially lower than BUD’s 23.1x, suggesting that MO’s earnings are available at a more attractive price. Furthermore, the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis points to a significant +60.0% upside for MO, dwarfing BUD’s +13.6% DCF upside. This suggests a greater margin of safety and potential for price appreciation if MO reaches its intrinsic value, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing “bud vs mo fundamentals and valuation” from a value perspective.
Income-focused investors will likely find Altria Group (MO) to be the more attractive option. MO offers a dividend yield of 0.06%, which, while modest in absolute terms, is three times higher than BUD’s dividend yield of 0.02%. For shareholders seeking regular income streams from their investments, MO provides a superior dividend profile. Coupled with its robust profitability margins, MO demonstrates a stronger capacity to sustain and potentially grow its dividend payments over time. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own comprehensive research before making investment decisions.
Alert Invest · Free Newsletter
Get alerts when top investors buy a stock!
Track when institutional investors and analysts change positions on BUD and MO. Free, every week.
- Institutional & insider moves
- Analyst upgrades & downgrades
- 100% free — unsubscribe anytime
FAQ: BUD vs MO
Is BUD or MO a better stock in 2026?
Altria Group (MO) shows a P/E ratio of 14.42x compared to BUD’s 23.1x, suggesting a more attractive valuation. Analysts also give MO a slightly higher buy rating percentage (61.5% vs 57.8%), though they forecast greater price target upside for BUD. The decision on which is ‘better’ depends on individual investment objectives for 2026, considering the full “bud vs mo stock comparison 2026” details. This is not investment advice.
Which has more analyst upside — BUD or MO?
BUD has a consensus analyst price target of $89, indicating an upside of +10.1%. MO’s consensus target is $71.67, with an upside of +3.3%. Based on these figures as of 2026-05-07, BUD shows more potential analyst upside. Not a prediction by Alert Invest.
Which is growing faster — BUD or MO?
BUD reported a year-over-year revenue growth of -0.4%, while MO’s revenue growth was -1.5%. While both are negative, BUD has a less severe decline, indicating stronger momentum in its revenue.
Which is more profitable — BUD or MO?
MO is significantly more profitable, with a net margin of 36.91% and an EBITDA margin of 53.61%. BUD’s net margin is 11.53% and its EBITDA margin is 26.98%. Both companies report N/A% for ROE.
Do BUD or MO pay dividends?
Yes, both companies pay dividends. MO offers a dividend yield of 0.06%, which is higher than BUD’s dividend yield of 0.02%.
For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. Data: Financial Modeling Prep & SEC EDGAR. Always do your own research.
