vs
PLAB
Updated 2026-05-08
PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) vs Photronics, Inc. (PLAB): Stock Comparison 2026
Quick verdict: CNXN vs PLAB in 2026
CNXN and PLAB present a contrasting investment profile for 2026, with CNXN holding an overall edge based on a majority of comparable metrics in the scorecard. CNXN emerges as the growth leader with positive revenue expansion and also the value leader due to more favorable valuation multiples and significant DCF upside. In contrast, PLAB demonstrates superior operational efficiency, making it the clear margin leader, while CNXN also stands out as the analyst favorite with a higher percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings and stronger DCF upside. Not investment advice.
✔ Best for Value: CNXN
✔ Best for Income: CNXN
CNXN vs PLAB: key metrics side by side
Full side-by-side comparison of CNXN and PLAB across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-08.
| Metric | CNXN | PLAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.87B | $849,294,000 |
| Revenue growth YoY | 2.5% CNXN wins | -2.0% |
| Gross margin | 18.83% | 35.14% PLAB wins |
| Net margin | 3.02% | 15.83% PLAB wins |
| EBITDA margin | 4.52% | 34.3% PLAB wins |
| ROE | N/A% | N/A% |
| FCF yield | 7.55% CNXN wins | 2.22% |
| P/E ratio | 18.83x CNXN wins | 21.32x |
| P/B ratio | 1.79x CNXN wins | 2.4x |
| Debt / equity | 0.01x | 0.0x PLAB wins |
| Dividend yield | 0.01% CNXN wins | 0% |
| Buy rating % | 100.0% CNXN wins | 63.6% |
| Analyst consensus | Buy | Buy |
| Price target upside | -100.0% | -2.0% PLAB wins |
| DCF upside | +25.9% CNXN wins | -47.8% |
| FMP rating | A | A |
CNXN vs PLAB valuation comparison
When considering the cnxn vs plab valuation, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) appears to offer a more attractive entry point based on several key metrics. CNXN trades at a P/E ratio of 18.83x, which is noticeably lower than Photronics, Inc.’s (PLAB) P/E of 21.32x. This suggests that investors are paying less for each dollar of CNXN’s earnings compared to PLAB, potentially indicating better value. Furthermore, looking at the price-to-book (P/B) ratio, CNXN stands at 1.79x, also more favorable than PLAB’s 2.4x, indicating that CNXN’s stock price is lower relative to its book value.
Perhaps the most compelling aspect of CNXN’s valuation is its discounted cash flow (DCF) upside, which projects a robust +25.9% potential from its current price of $65.35 to a fair value of $82.27. This contrasts sharply with PLAB, which has a DCF indicating a -47.8% downside from its current $50.36 to a fair value of $26.29. This stark difference suggests that CNXN may be significantly undervalued, offering substantial appreciation potential, whereas PLAB appears considerably overvalued by this metric. Investors focused on intrinsic value might find CNXN’s overall valuation metrics more appealing in this cnxn vs plab stock comparison 2026.
CNXN vs PLAB growth comparison
In terms of growth, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) demonstrates stronger momentum compared to Photronics, Inc. (PLAB), a critical factor in a cnxn vs plab stock comparison 2026. CNXN reported a revenue growth of +2.5% year-over-year, indicating a healthy, albeit modest, expansion in its top line. This positive growth suggests that the company is successfully expanding its operations and market reach within its segment. At a total revenue of $2.87 billion, CNXN is also a considerably larger company by top-line revenue than PLAB, offering a different scale of operations and market footprint.
Conversely, Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) experienced a revenue decline of -2.0% year-over-year, reporting revenue of $849,294,000. This contraction suggests that PLAB is facing headwinds or a slowdown in demand for its specialized products, which could be a concern for growth-oriented investors. While PLAB operates in a specific semiconductor manufacturing segment, its negative revenue growth indicates a clear lack of positive momentum, especially when pitted against CNXN’s continued expansion. For those prioritizing an expanding top line and market growth, CNXN clearly has the edge in this growth comparison.
CNXN vs PLAB profitability
When examining CNXN vs PLAB profitability, Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) exhibits significantly superior margins, indicating a highly efficient operational structure. PLAB boasts an impressive net margin of 15.83% and an even more robust EBITDA margin of 34.3%. These figures are substantially higher than CNXN’s net margin of 3.02% and EBITDA margin of 4.52%. PLAB’s remarkable ability to convert a larger portion of its revenue into profit, both before and after taxes, highlights its strong pricing power, effective cost control, or a highly favorable product mix within its specialized semiconductor industry.
Despite PLAB’s higher profit margins, CNXN demonstrates a more attractive free cash flow (FCF) yield relative to its market capitalization. CNXN’s FCF yield stands at a robust 7.55%, indicating that it generates a substantial amount of cash that can be used for reinvestment into the business, debt reduction, or potential shareholder returns. PLAB’s FCF yield, while positive, is lower at 2.22%. Both companies report N/A for Return on Equity (ROE), preventing a direct comparison on this specific metric. Therefore, while PLAB excels in margin-based profitability, CNXN shows a stronger ability to generate free cash flow.
Analyst ratings: CNXN vs PLAB
The analyst ratings for PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) and Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) present an interesting contrast, offering nuanced insights for investors in this cnxn vs plab stock comparison 2026. CNXN, despite being covered by only one analyst, has received a unanimous 100.0% ‘Buy’ rating. This strong conviction from the sole analyst might seem compelling; however, the provided target price of $0, representing a -100.0% downside from the current price of $65.35, creates a significant and unusual discrepancy that warrants careful scrutiny, as it fundamentally contradicts the ‘Buy’ consensus and suggests a complete loss of investment.
In contrast, Photronics, Inc. (PLAB) is more widely covered, with 11 analysts weighing in on its prospects. Of these, 63.6% have issued a ‘Buy’ rating, which, while not unanimous, still represents a strong majority consensus of ‘Buy’. PLAB’s average target price stands at $49.33, indicating a more realistic, albeit slightly negative, -2.0% potential downside from its current price of $50.36. This more conventional target, combined with broader analyst coverage, might offer a more reliable gauge of market sentiment and future expectations compared to CNXN’s conflicting data. While both companies have an overall ‘Buy’ consensus, the details of PLAB’s analyst targets appear more grounded and less contradictory.
Should I buy CNXN or PLAB stock in 2026?
Deciding whether to buy CNXN or PLAB stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s specific objectives and risk tolerance, given their distinct financial profiles. For growth-oriented investors, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) appears to be the more favorable choice. CNXN has demonstrated positive revenue growth of +2.5% year-over-year, indicating an expanding business and potential for future market share gains. This contrasts with Photronics, Inc. (PLAB), which experienced a -2.0% decline in revenue, suggesting a contraction or challenges in its current market, which is generally unfavorable for growth strategies.
For value investors, the cnxn vs plab fundamentals and valuation metrics lean strongly in favor of CNXN. CNXN trades at a lower P/E ratio of 18.83x compared to PLAB’s 21.32x, and a lower P/B ratio of 1.79x versus PLAB’s 2.4x. Critically, CNXN’s discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis suggests a significant +25.9% upside to its fair value, positioning it as potentially undervalued with considerable room for appreciation. PLAB, conversely, shows a substantial -47.8% DCF downside, implying it might be overvalued. These valuation metrics indicate CNXN offers a better margin of safety and potential for price appreciation based on its intrinsic value.
Regarding income, CNXN provides a minimal dividend yield of 0.01%, which, while very small, is still more than PLAB’s 0% dividend yield. Therefore, for investors seeking any form of income, however slight, CNXN would be the technically preferred option. However, neither stock is a significant income play for those relying on dividends. Ultimately, for a comprehensive perspective on should i buy cnxn or plab stock 2026, CNXN generally presents a more robust investment case, particularly for those focused on growth and value, despite PLAB’s superior profitability margins. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.
Alert Invest · Free Newsletter
Get alerts when top investors buy a stock!
Track when institutional investors and analysts change positions on CNXN and PLAB. Free, every week.
- Institutional & insider moves
- Analyst upgrades & downgrades
- 100% free — unsubscribe anytime
FAQ: CNXN vs PLAB
Is CNXN or PLAB a better stock in 2026?
CNXN trades at a P/E of 18.83x with 100.0% buy ratings from analysts and a DCF upside of +25.9%. PLAB has a P/E of 21.32x with 63.6% buy ratings and a DCF downside of -47.8%. CNXN appears to have a more compelling valuation and analyst sentiment despite a problematic price target. Not investment advice.
Which has more analyst upside — CNXN or PLAB?
CNXN’s consensus target is $0, representing a -100.0% downside. PLAB’s consensus target is $49.33, representing a -2.0% downside. Based purely on analyst price targets, PLAB suggests a significantly less negative outlook. However, CNXN’s DCF model indicates a +25.9% upside, whereas PLAB’s indicates a -47.8% downside. As of 2026-05-08. Not a prediction by Alert Invest.
Which is growing faster — CNXN or PLAB?
CNXN reported a revenue growth of 2.5% YoY, whereas PLAB reported a revenue growth of -2.0% YoY. CNXN clearly has stronger revenue momentum.
Which is more profitable — CNXN or PLAB?
CNXN has a net margin of 3.02% and an EBITDA margin of 4.52%, with ROE N/A%. PLAB has a much higher net margin of 15.83% and an EBITDA margin of 34.3%, with ROE also N/A%.
Do CNXN or PLAB pay dividends?
CNXN has a dividend yield of 0.01%, while PLAB has a dividend yield of 0%.
For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. Data: Financial Modeling Prep & SEC EDGAR. Always do your own research.
