Quick verdict: ANET vs APH in 2026

Overall, Amphenol Corporation (APH) appears to have a slight edge over Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) when examining several key metrics in this 2026 stock comparison. APH emerges as the clear leader in revenue growth, while also presenting a more appealing valuation profile. ANET, however, demonstrates superior profitability margins and a robust balance sheet. Analysts show a stronger “Buy” conviction for ANET, yet project greater price target upside for APH. Not investment advice.

ANET vs APH: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of ANET and APH across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-04-17.

ANET vs APH valuation comparison

When conducting an ANET vs APH valuation comparison, Amphenol Corporation (APH) generally presents a more favorable picture for value-oriented investors in 2026. Arista Networks (ANET) trades at a significantly higher P/E ratio of 57.67x, indicating a much richer valuation relative to its earnings. In contrast, APH’s P/E ratio stands at 42.75x, suggesting it offers a more reasonable entry point based on current earnings. This difference is substantial, highlighting that the market places a higher premium on ANET’s growth or future prospects, making APH appear comparatively undervalued by traditional P/E metrics.

Further examining the ANET vs APH fundamentals and valuation, the price-to-book (P/B) ratio also favors Amphenol, which trades at 13.61x compared to ANET’s 16.37x. This reinforces APH’s position as the relatively cheaper stock when considering assets. Both companies show negative DCF upside, suggesting they are currently overvalued based on their discounted cash flow models. However, APH’s DCF indicates a -42.7% undervaluation, which is less severe than ANET’s -53.1%. This means that while both are trading above their intrinsic value according to this model, APH is closer to its fair value, offering less theoretical overvaluation risk. For investors prioritizing value, APH clearly holds an advantage.

ANET vs APH growth comparison

In terms of growth momentum, Amphenol Corporation (APH) takes a commanding lead in this ANET vs APH stock comparison for 2026. APH reported an impressive year-over-year revenue growth of 51.7%, showcasing significant expansion and market capture. This robust performance outpaces Arista Networks (ANET), which, while still growing strongly, posted a revenue growth rate of 28.6%. APH’s substantially higher growth rate suggests a company rapidly expanding its market presence and potentially benefiting from strong demand in its diverse end markets and strategic acquisitions.

This exceptional revenue growth for APH translates into stronger overall momentum, signaling to investors that the company is effectively scaling its operations and generating substantial top-line increases. While ANET’s 28.6% growth is certainly respectable for a company of its size, particularly given its high profitability margins, APH’s nearly double growth rate indicates superior market dynamics or strategic execution in the current environment. Investors focused on high-growth opportunities and rapid expansion would likely find APH more appealing based on these recent performance figures, highlighting APH’s potential for continued market share gains and future earnings acceleration.

ANET vs APH profitability

When analyzing ANET vs APH profitability, Arista Networks (ANET) demonstrates significantly stronger profit margins, showcasing its superior operational efficiency. ANET boasts an impressive net margin of 38.99%, which is more than double Amphenol Corporation’s (APH) net margin of 18.49%. This substantial difference indicates that ANET is exceptionally adept at converting its revenue into net income, pointing to a highly efficient cost structure or premium product pricing within its specialized niche of high-performance networking solutions. Furthermore, ANET’s EBITDA margin stands at 43.62%, far exceeding APH’s 29.84%, reinforcing ANET’s advantage in core operational profitability before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.

Despite ANET’s superior margins, the free cash flow (FCF) yield presents a slightly different picture in this profitability assessment. APH edges out ANET with a FCF yield of 2.39% compared to ANET’s 2.1%. While both are relatively low, APH’s marginally higher FCF yield suggests it generates a slightly larger portion of its market capitalization in free cash, which can be crucial for reinvestment, debt repayment, or potential dividends. Neither company provides a reported Return on Equity (ROE) figure, making a direct comparison on this specific metric impossible based on the provided data. However, the clear winner in terms of overall margin health and earnings conversion remains ANET, indicating it generates more cash from each dollar of revenue.

Analyst ratings: ANET vs APH

Analysts hold a generally positive outlook for both Arista Networks (ANET) and Amphenol Corporation (APH) in 2026, though with differing levels of conviction. When evaluating the ANET vs APH stock comparison 2026 from an analyst perspective, ANET garners a significantly higher percentage of “Buy” ratings. Out of 51 analysts covering ANET, a robust 74.5% recommend it as a “Buy,” reflecting strong confidence in its future performance and market position within cloud networking. The consensus price target for ANET is $184.38, implying a respectable +14.5% upside from its current price of $161.01. This high conviction signals that a large majority of professionals see continued growth and value in ANET’s technological advancements and market penetration.

On the other hand, APH also receives a “Buy” consensus from analysts, but with a lower percentage of “Buy” ratings. Of the 29 analysts tracking APH, 51.7% recommend a “Buy” rating. While this still indicates a positive sentiment, it is less overwhelming than the endorsement for ANET. Interestingly, APH’s consensus price target of $176.88 suggests a higher potential upside of +18.7% from its current price of $148.96, surpassing ANET’s projected gain. This suggests that while fewer analysts are as strongly convinced about APH, those who are see greater appreciation potential, possibly due to its lower current valuation or higher revenue growth rate, which could offer more room for stock price expansion.

Should I buy ANET or APH stock in 2026?

Deciding whether should I buy ANET or APH stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s specific objectives and risk tolerance. For growth-oriented investors, Amphenol Corporation (APH) might present a more compelling opportunity. Its exceptional year-over-year revenue growth of 51.7% significantly outpaces ANET’s 28.6%, demonstrating stronger top-line momentum and potentially greater market expansion across its diversified interconnect and sensor products. While both operate in the technology sector, APH’s aggressive growth trajectory suggests it is capitalizing more effectively on current market conditions or strategic initiatives, making it potentially more attractive for those seeking rapid expansion in their portfolio.

For value investors scrutinizing ANET vs APH fundamentals and valuation, Amphenol (APH) appears to offer a more appealing entry point. APH trades at a P/E ratio of 42.75x and a P/B ratio of 13.61x, both considerably lower than ANET’s P/E of 57.67x and P/B of 16.37x. Furthermore, APH’s DCF valuation shows a less severe theoretical overvaluation at -42.7% compared to ANET’s -53.1%. These metrics suggest that APH is relatively cheaper and offers better value for money based on its earnings and assets, potentially providing a wider margin of safety for long-term investors conscious of valuation multiples and looking for a more conservatively priced growth play in the technology space.

When considering income, both companies offer minimal appeal, thus failing to meet the criteria for income-focused portfolios. Arista Networks (ANET) currently has a 0% dividend yield, making it entirely unsuitable for investors seeking regular cash flow from their holdings. Amphenol Corporation (APH) offers a minuscule dividend yield of 0.01%, which, while technically greater than zero, is practically negligible for income purposes and unlikely to be a primary driver for investment. Therefore, for investors whose primary goal is substantial dividend income, neither ANET nor APH stands out as a strong candidate. This analysis should serve as a guide for your own research; this is not investment advice.

More ANET and APH comparisons

ANET full stock analysis · APH full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: ANET vs APH