Quick verdict: APO vs BLK in 2026

Apollo Global Management (APO) generally holds the overall edge in this apo vs blk stock comparison 2026, driven by its compelling valuation and stronger analyst conviction. While BlackRock (BLK) demonstrates superior revenue growth momentum and higher net and EBITDA margins, Apollo Global Management shines with a significantly lower P/E ratio, a much higher Free Cash Flow yield, and a substantially undervalued DCF model, indicating considerable potential upside. Analysts also show a clearer preference for APO, with a higher percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings and slightly more aggressive price target upside, making it a potentially more attractive option for value-oriented investors seeking strong fundamentals. Not investment advice.

APO vs BLK: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of APO and BLK across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-04-29.

APO vs BLK valuation comparison

When examining the apo vs blk valuation metrics, Apollo Global Management (APO) presents a more attractive picture for value-conscious investors as of 2026-04-29. APO currently trades at a P/E ratio of 16.76x, considerably lower than BlackRock’s (BLK) P/E of 26.06x. This suggests that the market is valuing Apollo’s earnings at a more conservative multiple compared to BlackRock, potentially offering a greater margin of safety or upside for expansion. Conversely, on a price-to-book basis, BLK is marginally cheaper at 2.92x compared to APO’s 3.22x, indicating that BlackRock’s assets might be acquired at a slightly more favorable rate relative to its market price.

The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis further highlights the compelling apo vs blk fundamentals and valuation discrepancies. APO’s current price of $123.57 is drastically below its DCF valuation of $557.51, implying a staggering upside of +351.2%. This suggests that Apollo Global Management is severely undervalued according to this intrinsic valuation method, pointing towards significant long-term potential. In stark contrast, BlackRock, priced at $1049.76, has a DCF valuation of $555.68, indicating a substantial overvaluation of -47.1%. This divergence in DCF analysis strongly positions APO as the more undervalued stock in this apo vs blk stock comparison 2026, making it a standout choice for those prioritizing intrinsic value.

APO vs BLK growth comparison

In terms of growth, BlackRock (BLK) currently demonstrates stronger top-line momentum in the apo vs blk stock comparison 2026. BLK reported a year-over-year revenue growth of +18.7%, outpacing Apollo Global Management’s (APO) respectable +16.0% revenue growth. This indicates that BlackRock is expanding its operations and market presence at a slightly faster clip, potentially appealing to growth-oriented investors looking for companies with accelerating revenue streams in the financial services sector. Both companies, however, exhibit robust growth, reflecting the dynamic nature of asset and alternative asset management markets.

While APO’s revenue growth is solid, BLK’s higher revenue growth combined with its superior profitability margins suggests stronger overall business momentum. BlackRock’s EBITDA margin of 38.07% and Net margin of 24.33% significantly exceed APO’s 34.61% and 14.79% respectively. This indicates that BLK is not only growing revenue faster but also converting a larger portion of that revenue into operational and net income. This efficiency could be a key factor for investors assessing which company has better long-term growth sustainability and operational leverage, making BLK a strong contender for those focused on high-quality growth.

APO vs BLK profitability

When evaluating apo vs blk profitability, BlackRock (BLK) stands out with significantly stronger profit margins. BLK boasts a net margin of 24.33%, which is considerably higher than Apollo Global Management’s (APO) 14.79%. This suggests that for every dollar of revenue, BlackRock retains a larger portion as profit, showcasing greater operational efficiency and cost management. Similarly, BLK’s EBITDA margin of 38.07% surpasses APO’s 34.61%, reinforcing BlackRock’s superior performance in generating earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. These figures are crucial for investors analyzing the core earning power of these financial services giants.

However, the Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield presents a different perspective on which company generates more cash. APO exhibits a robust FCF yield of 7.55%, significantly outperforming BLK’s 2.2%. This indicates that Apollo Global Management is generating a much higher amount of cash flow relative to its market capitalization, which can be deployed for debt reduction, share buybacks, or further investments, potentially offering more flexibility. While both companies have N/A for Return on Equity (ROE) in the provided data, APO’s strong FCF yield suggests a powerful ability to convert earnings into actual cash, a vital consideration for long-term financial health and investor returns.

Analyst ratings: APO vs BLK

Analyst sentiment provides a critical external perspective in the apo vs blk stock comparison 2026. Apollo Global Management (APO) appears to be the stronger analyst favorite, with 85.7% of 28 analysts issuing a ‘Buy’ rating. This compares favorably to BlackRock (BLK), which has a ‘Buy’ rating from 75.8% of its 33 covering analysts. While both firms maintain an overall ‘Buy’ consensus, the higher percentage for APO indicates a more widespread bullish outlook among the financial community. This stronger conviction for APO could be a reassuring factor for potential investors, suggesting a clearer path to achieving their target price.

Furthermore, analysts project a slightly higher upside for APO compared to BLK. The consensus price target for APO is $157.25, representing a potential upside of +27.3% from its current price of $123.57. For BLK, the average target price stands at $1311.78, indicating a +25.0% upside from its price of $1049.76. Although both offer attractive upside potential, APO’s marginally higher projected gain, coupled with its stronger ‘Buy’ rating percentage, suggests analysts foresee a slightly more pronounced appreciation for Apollo Global Management. This makes APO the preferred choice based on analyst recommendations and price target expectations, further solidifying its position in the apo vs blk fundamentals and valuation discussion.

Should I buy APO or BLK stock in 2026?

When considering should I buy apo or blk stock in 2026, growth investors might find BlackRock (BLK) slightly more appealing due to its higher year-over-year revenue growth of +18.7% compared to Apollo Global Management’s (APO) +16.0%. BLK’s superior net and EBITDA margins also suggest a more efficient growth model that converts revenue into profit at a higher rate. This robust growth trajectory and operational efficiency make BLK a strong candidate for those prioritizing top-line expansion and sustained profitability, positioning it as a potentially dynamic player in their portfolio in this apo vs blk stock comparison 2026. However, APO’s strong revenue growth should not be underestimated, indicating a healthy and expanding business itself.

For value investors, Apollo Global Management (APO) presents a significantly more attractive proposition. Its P/E ratio of 16.76x is substantially lower than BLK’s 26.06x, indicating that APO’s earnings are available at a more favorable price. Crucially, APO shows an astounding +351.2% upside based on its Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation, contrasting sharply with BLK’s -47.1% overvaluation by the same metric. This profound undervaluation of APO’s intrinsic worth, coupled with its robust Free Cash Flow yield of 7.55% (compared to BLK’s 2.2%), highlights its potential as a deep value play. Therefore, for investors focused on intrinsic value and a margin of safety, APO stands out in the apo vs blk fundamentals and valuation debate.

Neither APO nor BLK currently offers a compelling dividend yield for income-focused investors, with both stocks yielding a negligible 0.02%. While both companies operate within the financial services sector, their current distribution policies do not prioritize significant payouts to shareholders in the form of dividends. Investors primarily seeking stable and substantial income streams might need to look beyond these two options. Instead, the investment thesis for both APO and BLK revolves more around capital appreciation driven by their respective growth trajectories, operational efficiencies, and valuation dynamics rather than passive income generation. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research before making any investment decisions.

More APO and BLK comparisons

APO full stock analysis · BLK full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: APO vs BLK