How this APO vs BN comparison is calculated

All metrics are based on trailing twelve months (TTM) financial data, consensus analyst estimates, and standardized valuation ratios. Data is sourced from Financial Modeling Prep and SEC EDGAR. Figures are normalized to ensure a fair comparison between Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Brookfield Corporation. Analyst price targets and ratings are aggregated from Wall Street consensus as of 2026-05-18.

Quick verdict: Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs Brookfield Corporation in 2026

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) appears to be the growth leader, demonstrating substantial topline expansion and superior profitability margins within its operations. From a valuation standpoint, APO presents a more attractive earnings multiple and a robust discounted cash flow (DCF) upside, while Brookfield Corporation (BN) boasts a lower price-to-book ratio and slightly higher analyst target upside. However, BN garners an even higher percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings from analysts, indicating a strong professional endorsement despite its recent negative revenue trend. Not investment advice.

Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs Brookfield Corporation: key metrics side by side

A full side-by-side look at Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN) across earnings multiples, profitability, revenue momentum, and analyst sentiment — data updated 2026-05-18.

Relative valuation: APO vs BN

When evaluating the investment appeal of Apollo Global Management, Inc. versus Brookfield Corporation, a glance at their respective earnings multiples reveals a notable divergence. Apollo Global Management, Inc. trades at a P/E ratio of 37.47x, suggesting a more moderate valuation relative to its profits. In stark contrast, BN carries a significantly higher price-to-earnings multiple of 85.36x, indicating that investors are currently assigning a much richer premium to its earnings, which might be influenced by factors such as anticipated long-term growth or the unique nature of its diversified asset portfolio.

Digging deeper into asset-based valuations, Brookfield Corporation shows a price-to-book ratio of 2.43x, which is considerably lower than APO’s 4.04x, potentially making BN more attractive to investors focused on tangible book value. However, the discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis presents a compelling upside for Apollo Global Management, Inc., projecting an impressive +300.1% increase from its current price to a target of $541.7. Conversely, Brookfield Corporation’s DCF calculation implies a negative upside of -112.3%, suggesting it may be overvalued based on its future cash flow projections. This substantial gap in intrinsic value estimates, based on current consensus data, strongly positions Apollo Global Management, Inc. as potentially offering a more attractive fundamental discount.

Revenue momentum: Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs Brookfield Corporation

Considering top-line expansion, Apollo Global Management, Inc. exhibits a robust growth trajectory, reporting a year-over-year revenue increase of 16.0%. This figure showcases the company’s ability to significantly expand its operations and generate increased sales. This positive revenue momentum for APO contrasts sharply with Brookfield Corporation, which recorded a revenue contraction of -11.5% over the same period, signaling challenges in maintaining its revenue base despite its larger scale with $76.13 billion in revenue compared to APO’s $30.30 billion.

Examining operational efficiency alongside revenue trends, Brookfield Corporation demonstrates a higher EBITDA margin of 40.58%, indicating strong core profitability from its primary business activities before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Apollo Global Management, Inc., while also maintaining a healthy EBITDA margin of 31.25%, trails its competitor in this specific metric. It is crucial for investors to recognize that while BN currently shows superior operational margin, this gap in revenue growth may not persist if economic conditions shift or if each company’s strategic initiatives evolve, potentially altering their respective growth trajectories in the future.

Profitability and cash generation: APO vs BN

In terms of bottom-line performance, Apollo Global Management, Inc. showcases a significantly stronger net margin of 7.24%. This indicates that APO is more efficient at converting its revenue into actual profit for shareholders after all expenses, including taxes, are accounted for. This level of net profitability is substantially higher than Brookfield Corporation’s net margin of 1.74%, highlighting Apollo Global Management, Inc.’s superior financial efficiency and ability to retain a larger portion of its sales as earnings.

Further illustrating the disparity in financial health, Apollo Global Management, Inc. boasts a positive free cash flow (FCF) yield of 7.69%. This metric suggests that APO generates a healthy amount of cash relative to its market capitalization, providing flexibility for investments, debt reduction, or shareholder returns. In contrast, BN records a negative free cash flow yield of -7.14%, which could indicate that the company is experiencing cash burn or investing heavily in its operations. Both companies report “N/A%” for Return on Equity (ROE), preventing a direct comparison of how efficiently they are using shareholder equity to generate profits. Apollo Global Management, Inc.’s positive cash conversion clearly positions it ahead in terms of immediate cash generation relative to its equity price.

Wall Street view: Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs Brookfield Corporation analyst ratings

The consensus from Wall Street analysts provides valuable insight into the perceived future performance of these two financial services giants. For Apollo Global Management, Inc., 28 analysts cover the stock, with a strong majority of 82.1% issuing a ‘Buy’ rating. The average analyst price target for APO stands at $157.25, suggesting an upside potential of 16.2% from its current trading price. This indicates a general positive sentiment regarding Apollo Global Management, Inc.’s prospects for growth and value creation.

Brookfield Corporation also enjoys a favorable outlook from the analyst community, with an even higher percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings. Of the 9 analysts covering BN, an impressive 88.9% recommend it as a ‘Buy’. Furthermore, the consensus price target for Brookfield Corporation is $56, implying a potential upside of 23.0%. While Apollo Global Management, Inc. has a larger analyst following, BN’s higher buy rating percentage and greater implied upside from its target price suggest a slightly more optimistic near-term outlook among those covering the stock, though these targets may vary depending on future estimate revisions and market dynamics.

Which investor profile fits APO vs BN?

For growth-oriented investors, Apollo Global Management, Inc. appears to be the more compelling choice. Its robust year-over-year revenue expansion of 16.0% clearly positions APO as a company with significant momentum, outperforming Brookfield Corporation’s revenue contraction of -11.5%. Investors prioritizing companies that demonstrate consistent top-line growth and the ability to scale operations will likely find Apollo Global Management, Inc.’s performance more aligned with their investment strategy, especially when considering its strong net margin.

Value investors, seeking assets trading below their intrinsic worth, might find Apollo Global Management, Inc. particularly interesting. With an earnings multiple of 37.47x, APO trades at a substantially lower valuation compared to Brookfield Corporation’s 85.36x P/E ratio. Crucially, APO’s discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation suggests an impressive upside of +300.1%, implying a significant potential for capital appreciation based on its fundamental value. While BN has a lower price-to-book ratio, APO’s overall valuation picture, particularly its intrinsic value estimate, points to a more pronounced fundamental discount.

Income investors, however, may find both Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Brookfield Corporation less appealing for their dividend payouts. APO offers a modest dividend yield of 0.02%, marginally higher than BN’s 0.01%. Given these very low yields, neither stock is a primary candidate for those seeking substantial dividend income. Investors focused on generating regular cash flow from their portfolios would likely look elsewhere, as the primary investment thesis for both companies centers more on capital appreciation and asset management rather than consistent income distribution. This is not investment advice. Always do your own research.

More Apollo Global Management, Inc. and Brookfield Corporation comparisons

Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) full stock analysis · Brookfield Corporation (BN) full stock analysis · All stock comparisons