vs
J
Updated 2026-04-09
Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) vs Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J): Stock Comparison 2026
Quick verdict: GEN vs J in 2026
Overall, Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) presents a compelling argument for investors seeking deep value and significant upside potential, while Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) shows slightly stronger top-line growth and a more conservative balance sheet. GEN emerges as the leader in profitability and offers a substantially higher analyst-implied upside based on its target price and DCF. While J boasts a higher percentage of analyst buy ratings and superior revenue growth, GEN clearly dominates on valuation and operating margins. Not investment advice.
Best for Value: GEN
Best for Income: GEN
GEN vs J: key metrics side by side
Full side-by-side comparison of GEN and J across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-04-09.
| Metric | GEN | J |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.94B | $12.03B |
| Revenue growth YoY | 3.6% | 4.6% J wins |
| Gross margin | 77.68% GEN wins | 24.43% |
| Net margin | 12.76% GEN wins | 3.52% |
| EBITDA margin | 46.14% GEN wins | 8.71% |
| ROE | N/A% | N/A% |
| FCF yield | 13.02% GEN wins | 5.65% |
| P/E ratio | 19.27x GEN wins | 35.71x |
| P/B ratio | 4.98x | 4.52x J wins |
| Debt / equity | 3.61x | 0.86x J wins |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% GEN wins | 0.01% |
| Buy rating % | 52.4% | 63.2% J wins |
| Analyst consensus | Buy | Buy |
| Price target upside | +69.4% GEN wins | +18.5% |
| DCF upside | +153.0% GEN wins | -19.3% |
| FMP rating | B+ | B |
GEN vs J valuation comparison
When considering the GEN vs J valuation, a clear distinction emerges that may guide investment decisions in 2026. Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) currently trades at a P/E ratio of 19.27x, which is significantly more attractive than Jacobs Solutions Inc.’s (J) P/E of 35.71x. This substantial difference suggests that GEN’s earnings are valued at a lower multiple by the market, potentially indicating an undervalued opportunity for investors seeking value. While GEN’s price-to-book ratio of 4.98x is slightly higher than J’s 4.52x, indicating J might be marginally cheaper on a book value basis, the overall picture points to GEN as the more compelling value play.
Furthermore, the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis reinforces GEN’s valuation appeal, projecting a remarkable +153.0% upside to its intrinsic value. This suggests that the stock is deeply undervalued based on its future cash flow generation capabilities. In contrast, J’s DCF analysis indicates a -19.3% downside from its current price, implying that it might be trading above its fair value. For investors focused on fundamental valuation and seeking significant potential upside, the GEN vs J valuation comparison for 2026 positions GEN as a clear favorite, offering a much more favorable entry point.
GEN vs J growth comparison
In the GEN vs J growth comparison, Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) demonstrates a slightly stronger top-line expansion. J reported a year-over-year revenue growth of +4.6%, outpacing Gen Digital Inc.’s (GEN) +3.6% growth. This indicates that J is expanding its business at a faster rate, which is a positive sign for investors prioritizing revenue momentum and market share capture. J’s larger revenue base of $12.03 billion also signifies a more established and scaled operation compared to GEN’s $3.94 billion.
However, revenue growth alone does not tell the entire story of a company’s health or its potential for future returns. When considering GEN vs J fundamentals and valuation, it’s crucial to acknowledge GEN’s superior profitability margins, despite its slightly lower revenue growth. These higher margins suggest that GEN is more efficient at converting its sales into actual profit, which can ultimately lead to faster earnings growth even with a moderate increase in revenue. While J currently boasts stronger top-line momentum, GEN’s efficiency ensures that each dollar of new revenue contributes more significantly to its bottom line, making it a nuanced choice for growth investors in 2026.
GEN vs J profitability
An examination of GEN vs J profitability metrics reveals Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) as a significantly more efficient and financially robust enterprise. GEN boasts a net margin of 12.76%, which is substantially higher than Jacobs Solutions Inc.’s (J) 3.52%. This wide margin difference indicates that GEN is far better at converting its revenue into profit, demonstrating superior cost management and pricing power within its operations. The disparity is even more pronounced in the EBITDA margin, where GEN commands an impressive 46.14% compared to J’s 8.71%, underscoring GEN’s operational efficiency before accounting for non-operating expenses.
Furthermore, when evaluating which company generates more cash, GEN clearly leads with a Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of 13.02%, nearly double J’s 5.65%. A higher FCF yield is a strong indicator of a company’s ability to generate cash that can be used for debt reduction, shareholder returns, or reinvestment in the business without external financing. Both companies report N/A% for Return on Equity (ROE), preventing a direct comparison on that metric. However, based on net margin, EBITDA margin, and FCF yield, GEN unequivocally demonstrates superior profitability and cash generation capabilities, making it a strong contender for investors focused on financial health.
Analyst ratings: GEN vs J
When comparing analyst ratings for GEN vs J, both companies enjoy a “Buy” consensus from the analysts covering them, yet the specifics offer different insights into their potential. Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) is followed by 21 analysts, with 52.4% issuing a “Buy” recommendation. Their collective price target for GEN stands at $32, which implies a considerable upside of +69.4% from its current trading price of $18.89. This significant upside potential suggests that analysts see substantial room for appreciation in GEN’s stock value, aligning with the positive DCF valuation.
Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J), on the other hand, benefits from broader analyst coverage, with 38 analysts providing ratings. A higher percentage, 63.2%, recommend a “Buy” for J, indicating a generally stronger positive sentiment among the analytical community for this stock. The consensus price target for J is $155.5, which represents an +18.5% upside from its current price of $131.21. While J has a higher proportion of buy ratings, GEN’s dramatically larger implied price target upside makes it the more attractive option for investors prioritizing significant capital gains based on current analyst projections in this GEN vs J analyst ratings and recommendations overview.
Should I buy GEN or J stock in 2026?
The question of “should I buy GEN or J stock in 2026” depends heavily on an investor’s individual strategy and risk tolerance. For growth-oriented investors, Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) might initially catch the eye with its slightly higher revenue growth rate of +4.6% compared to GEN’s +3.6%. While J’s larger revenue base also suggests a more established market presence, it’s crucial to look beyond just the top-line. GEN’s significantly higher profitability margins mean that each dollar of its revenue translates into more substantial profits, which could ultimately lead to stronger earnings per share growth despite a slower sales increase.
Value investors seeking opportunities with substantial upside potential should closely consider Gen Digital Inc. (GEN). Its P/E ratio of 19.27x is considerably more appealing than J’s 35.71x, presenting GEN as a more reasonably priced asset relative to its earnings. Furthermore, the DCF analysis for GEN indicates a remarkable +153.0% upside, a compelling signal of potential deep undervaluation. In stark contrast, J’s DCF suggests a -19.3% downside, highlighting a potential overvaluation. For those focused on GEN vs J fundamentals and valuation, GEN offers a more attractive entry point and a greater margin of safety.
For investors prioritizing income, neither GEN nor J stands out as a strong dividend-paying stock, as both offer negligible yields. GEN’s dividend yield of 0.03% is marginally higher than J’s 0.01%, but neither would appeal to traditional income seekers. Ultimately, if the goal is capital appreciation driven by strong fundamentals and a favorable valuation, GEN appears to be the more compelling choice for the year 2026. However, if consistent, albeit modest, top-line growth and broader analyst consensus are priorities, J might be considered. This is not investment advice; always conduct thorough personal research.
Alert Invest · Free Newsletter
Get alerts when top investors buy a stock!
Track when institutional investors and analysts change positions on GEN and J. Free, every week.
- Institutional & insider moves
- Analyst upgrades & downgrades
- 100% free — unsubscribe anytime
FAQ: GEN vs J
Is GEN or J a better stock in 2026?
Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) offers a more attractive valuation with a P/E ratio of 19.27x compared to Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) at 35.71x, and a much higher implied DCF upside. While J has a higher percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings from analysts (63.2% vs. GEN’s 52.4%), GEN presents significantly greater price target upside potential. This is not investment advice.
Which has more analyst upside — GEN or J?
GEN has a consensus analyst price target of $32, which implies a substantial +69.4% upside from its current price. J’s consensus price target is $155.5, representing an +18.5% upside. As of 2026-04-09. Not a prediction by Alert Invest.
Which is growing faster — GEN or J?
GEN revenue growth: 3.6% YoY. J revenue growth: 4.6% YoY. Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) currently has stronger top-line momentum.
Which is more profitable — GEN or J?
GEN is significantly more profitable with a net margin of 12.76% and an EBITDA margin of 46.14%. J has a net margin of 3.52% and an EBITDA margin of 8.71%. Both companies report N/A% for ROE.
Do GEN or J pay dividends?
Yes, both companies pay dividends, but their yields are very low. GEN has a dividend yield of 0.03%, while J has a dividend yield of 0.01%.
For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. Data: Financial Modeling Prep & SEC EDGAR. Always do your own research.
