Quick verdict: GS vs HSBC in 2026

HSBC generally presents a stronger fundamental profile in early 2026, leading across most growth, value, and profitability metrics. HSBC shows superior revenue growth, higher net and EBITDA margins, and a significantly higher discounted cash flow (DCF) upside, positioning it as a potentially more attractive option for both growth and value investors. Conversely, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has a higher percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings from analysts and a positive consensus price target upside, suggesting a different perspective from market professionals. Not investment advice.

GS vs HSBC: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of GS and HSBC across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-03-28.

GS vs HSBC valuation comparison

When assessing GS vs HSBC valuation, the conventional Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and Price-to-Book (P/B) ratios are both listed as 0x for both The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and HSBC Holdings plc based on the provided data as of March 28, 2026. This renders them uninformative for a direct comparative valuation using these specific metrics. Investors would need to look at alternative valuation methods or more granular financial data to draw definitive conclusions based on P/E and P/B.

However, a more insightful metric for valuation in this instance is the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) upside. HSBC stands out significantly with a projected DCF upside of +146.5%, suggesting a substantial undervaluation relative to its intrinsic value according to this model. In contrast, GS shows a more modest DCF upside of +8.8%. This stark difference indicates that from a fundamental intrinsic value perspective, HSBC appears considerably cheaper and offers far greater potential for capital appreciation if it trades closer to its fair value. This makes HSBC a potentially more attractive option for value-oriented investors looking for deep discounts in 2026.

GS vs HSBC growth comparison

Examining the growth trajectory for GS vs HSBC in 2026 reveals a clear difference in momentum. HSBC Holdings plc reported a positive year-over-year revenue growth of +3.2%, indicating expansion and a healthy demand for its services. This consistent growth suggests that HSBC is effectively navigating the current market environment and expanding its top line. Meanwhile, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. experienced a slight revenue decline, with a year-over-year growth rate of -1.4%. This indicates some headwinds or a period of consolidation for the investment banking giant, potentially impacting investor confidence in its near-term growth prospects.

Beyond top-line revenue, profitability margins, while primarily a profitability metric, also indirectly reflect a company’s ability to grow efficiently. HSBC’s superior net margin of 17.46% and EBITDA margin of 26.3% compared to GS’s 13.73% net margin and 19.21% EBITDA margin suggest that HSBC is not only growing its revenue but also doing so more profitably. This efficiency in converting revenue to profit can contribute to stronger sustainable growth. For investors prioritizing companies with robust expansion and positive momentum in early 2026, HSBC demonstrates stronger growth characteristics.

GS vs HSBC profitability

In terms of profitability, HSBC Holdings plc demonstrates a notable advantage over The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. HSBC boasts a net margin of 17.46% and an EBITDA margin of 26.3%, indicating a more efficient operation in converting its revenues into profit. These figures are considerably higher than GS’s net margin of 13.73% and EBITDA margin of 19.21%. A higher net margin suggests HSBC retains a larger percentage of its revenue as profit, while a stronger EBITDA margin points to better operational performance before accounting for non-operating expenses and other deductions.

Further extending the profitability comparison, the Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield provides insight into how much cash a company generates relative to its market value. HSBC reports an FCF yield of 0%, which, while not robust, is significantly better than GS’s concerning FCF yield of -19.82%. A negative FCF yield indicates that GS is burning cash or investing heavily, which can be a red flag for some investors, especially when compared to a peer that is at least breaking even on FCF. Regarding Return on Equity (ROE), both GS and HSBC are listed as N/A%, meaning this metric cannot be used for direct comparison based on the provided data. Overall, HSBC appears to generate more cash and is more profitable on a per-revenue basis.

Analyst ratings: GS vs HSBC

When we look at analyst sentiment for a GS vs HSBC stock comparison 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. appears to garner a more favorable outlook, at least in terms of potential price appreciation and percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings. Out of 55 analysts covering GS, 40.0% recommend a ‘Buy’ rating, leading to a consensus ‘Hold’ recommendation. Their average price target stands at $915.15, representing a significant +14.0% upside from its current price of $802.89. This indicates a positive expectation for GS’s share price performance over the coming period.

In contrast, HSBC Holdings plc, covered by 19 analysts, has a slightly lower percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings at 36.8%, also resulting in a consensus ‘Hold’. More critically, the analyst consensus target for HSBC is set at $52, which represents a substantial -34.3% downside from its current price of $79.19. This stark difference in target price upside suggests that while HSBC’s fundamentals might look strong, analysts are more cautious about its near-term stock performance, whereas they see more room for growth in GS’s share price.

Should I buy GS or HSBC stock in 2026?

Deciding whether to buy GS or HSBC stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s specific objectives and risk tolerance. For growth-oriented investors, HSBC Holdings plc appears to hold a stronger position. With a positive revenue growth of +3.2% year-over-year, compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.’s -1.4% decline, HSBC demonstrates clearer top-line momentum. Furthermore, HSBC’s superior net margin of 17.46% and EBITDA margin of 26.3% suggest more efficient and profitable growth, making it an appealing option for those prioritizing expanding businesses with strong operational performance.

For value investors seeking undervalued assets, HSBC also presents a compelling case based on our assessment of gs vs hsbc fundamentals and valuation. Its impressive Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) upside of +146.5% points to significant potential for appreciation as the stock moves towards its intrinsic value. This contrasts sharply with GS’s more limited DCF upside of +8.8%. While P/E and P/B ratios are 0x for both, making them inconclusive for this comparison based on provided data, the DCF analysis clearly signals HSBC as the stock with greater intrinsic value potential in the current market. This makes HSBC a strong candidate for a value play.

When considering income generation, HSBC slightly edges out GS. HSBC offers a dividend yield of 0.05%, which, though modest, is higher than GS’s 0.02%. This makes HSBC a marginally better choice for investors prioritizing a higher dividend income from their financial services holdings. Ultimately, while analysts show more near-term optimism for GS’s price target, HSBC’s stronger fundamental and valuation metrics suggest it might be the more robust choice for growth, value, and income seekers in 2026. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own comprehensive research before making investment decisions.

More GS and HSBC comparisons

GS full stock analysis · HSBC full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: GS vs HSBC