Quick verdict: IE vs JAMF in 2026

Overall, Jamf Holding Corp. (JAMF) exhibits an edge across several fundamental metrics, particularly in operational scale, profitability, and free cash flow generation, leading on 5 of 9 comparable metrics in our ie vs jamf stock comparison 2026. JAMF is the growth leader with a slightly higher revenue growth rate and vastly larger revenue base, while also demonstrating superior margin performance, making it the margin leader. Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (IE), however, garners unanimous “Buy” ratings from analysts and shows significantly higher potential price target upside, making it the analyst favourite and the stock with the most theoretical upside according to targets. Not investment advice.

IE vs JAMF: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of IE and JAMF across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-12.

IE vs JAMF valuation comparison

When considering the ie vs jamf fundamentals and valuation in 2026, both companies present complex valuation profiles, largely due to their unprofitability. Ivanhoe Electric (IE) has a P/E ratio of -19.34x, while Jamf Holding (JAMF) stands at -42.01x. For unprofitable companies, a less negative P/E generally indicates a relatively cheaper valuation given its losses. On this basis, IE appears less expensive than JAMF. However, the P/B ratio paints a different picture; IE trades at 4.19x book value compared to JAMF’s significantly lower 2.2x, suggesting JAMF is more attractively valued on an asset-backed basis.

The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models further highlight valuation challenges for both. IE’s DCF analysis suggests an implied upside of -96.0%, indicating its fair value is estimated at $0.6, well below its current price of $14.88. JAMF’s DCF is even more concerning, showing a staggering -377.5% implied upside, with a negative fair value of $-36.22. While both figures suggest severe overvaluation by traditional DCF methodologies, IE’s valuation appears less stretched than JAMF’s from this perspective. Therefore, when looking at the IE vs JAMF valuation, JAMF presents a more favorable P/B ratio, while IE’s P/E and DCF indicate a less extreme overvaluation.

IE vs JAMF growth comparison

In terms of growth, both Ivanhoe Electric and Jamf Holding demonstrate similar year-over-year revenue growth rates, but their scales of operation are vastly different. JAMF reported TTM revenue of $627,399,000, achieving a growth rate of +11.9%. This indicates a robust and established business with continued expansion. In contrast, IE reported a TTM revenue of $3,244,000, growing at a slightly lower rate of +11.8%. While IE’s growth percentage is comparable, its significantly smaller revenue base suggests it is either in a much earlier stage of commercialization or operates in a niche market.

The substantial difference in revenue size means JAMF currently possesses far stronger revenue momentum and market penetration. Although IE’s growth percentage is almost identical, its path to generating substantial revenue is considerably longer. Furthermore, the extremely negative margins for IE, such as an EBITDA margin of -5326.31%, indicate that its revenue growth is currently coming at a very high cost, signaling a pre-profitability or heavy investment phase. JAMF, despite being unprofitable, has a positive EBITDA margin of 2.48%, reflecting a more mature operational profile.

IE vs JAMF profitability

A direct ie vs jamf profitability comparison reveals stark differences, with Jamf Holding demonstrating a significantly healthier financial standing despite both companies reporting negative net margins. Ivanhoe Electric’s net margin is an alarming -3477.72%, and its EBITDA margin is -5326.31%. These figures highlight that IE is either in a very early stage of revenue generation, incurring massive operational costs relative to its sales, or undergoing substantial investment that heavily impacts its bottom line. Its Return on Equity (ROE) is N/A%, consistent with its early-stage financial profile.

Jamf Holding, while still unprofitable, shows considerably better performance. JAMF’s net margin stands at -5.98% and its EBITDA margin is a positive 2.48%. This indicates that JAMF is much closer to achieving overall profitability from its core operations and manages its expenses far more effectively than IE. Furthermore, JAMF boasts a positive Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of 6.17%, meaning it generates cash from its operations. In contrast, IE has a negative FCF yield of -5.37%, indicating it is burning cash to fund its operations. Clearly, when considering which company generates more cash and is more profitable, JAMF holds a dominant position.

Analyst ratings: IE vs JAMF

When assessing analyst sentiment for an ie vs jamf stock comparison 2026, Ivanhoe Electric (IE) clearly stands out as the favorite. Out of 5 analysts covering IE, a remarkable 100.0% have issued a “Buy” rating, leading to a strong consensus of “Buy”. Their collective price target for IE is $16.17, which represents a substantial upside potential of +8.7% from its current price. This unanimous bullish sentiment from all covering analysts suggests strong confidence in IE’s future prospects, despite its current financials.

Conversely, Jamf Holding (JAMF) receives a more mixed, cautious outlook from the analyst community. With a larger pool of 15 analysts providing coverage, only 33.3% have rated JAMF as a “Buy,” leading to an overall consensus of “Hold.” The average price target for JAMF is $13, which implies a slight downside of -0.4% from its current trading price. This indicates that while some analysts see value in JAMF, a majority are either neutral or recommend against buying at current levels, suggesting less conviction compared to the enthusiastic support for IE.

Should I buy IE or JAMF stock in 2026?

Deciding whether should I buy IE or JAMF stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s risk tolerance and investment objectives, considering their distinct financial profiles. For growth investors, Jamf Holding (JAMF) appears to offer a more established platform with a much larger revenue base of $627,399,000 and a slightly higher revenue growth rate of +11.9%. While both companies show similar percentage growth, JAMF’s scale signifies more robust market presence and potential for absolute revenue expansion in the technology sector. Its positive EBITDA margin and FCF yield also suggest a more sustainable growth trajectory compared to IE’s heavily negative margins.

For value investors, the picture is complex. JAMF has a more attractive Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 2.2x compared to IE’s 4.19x, indicating it is cheaper relative to its assets. However, both companies are unprofitable, with negative P/E ratios. IE’s P/E of -19.34x is less negative than JAMF’s -42.01x, which could suggest it’s less expensive on a per-earnings basis despite losses. Both DCF models suggest significant overvaluation, but IE’s implied -96.0% upside is less extreme than JAMF’s -377.5%. Therefore, neither is a clear “value” play in the traditional sense, but JAMF might be considered better for value based on P/B while IE appears less overvalued by DCF.

For income-focused investors, neither IE nor JAMF are suitable options as both currently offer a 0% dividend yield. Both companies are in growth or development phases where profits, if any, are reinvested back into the business rather than distributed to shareholders. Investors seeking regular income streams should look elsewhere. Ultimately, an investor’s choice will hinge on prioritizing either analyst conviction and high target upside (IE) or greater operational scale, profitability metrics, and free cash flow generation (JAMF). This is not investment advice; please conduct your own thorough due diligence.

More IE and JAMF comparisons

IE full stock analysis · JAMF full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: IE vs JAMF