Quick verdict: BCS vs ING in 2026

Overall, Barclays PLC (BCS) emerges as the stronger contender in this 2026 comparison against ING Groep N.V. (ING). BCS shows a distinct advantage across key metrics, making it the leader for value and profitability, and also demonstrating relatively stronger operational performance despite a challenging revenue environment. Analysts also show a clear preference for BCS, projecting substantial upside. Not investment advice.

BCS vs ING: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of BCS and ING across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-03.

BCS vs ING valuation comparison

When assessing the BCS vs ING valuation, Barclays PLC (BCS) appears to offer a more compelling proposition for investors seeking value. BCS is currently trading at a P/E ratio of 8.21x, which is noticeably lower than ING Groep N.V.’s (ING) P/E ratio of 11.13x. This suggests that investors are paying less for each dollar of BCS’s earnings compared to ING. Furthermore, BCS’s price-to-book (P/B) ratio stands at a favorable 0.78x, placing it below its book value, while ING trades above its book value at a P/B of 1.41x. These metrics collectively indicate that BCS is trading at a discount relative to its assets and earnings when compared to ING, making it a potentially more attractive value play in the financial services sector as of 2026-05-03.

The discounted cash flow (DCF) models further reinforce BCS’s stronger valuation outlook. BCS shows an impressive implied DCF upside of +382.2% from its current price of $23.43, suggesting significant undervaluation by the market. In contrast, ING’s DCF model indicates a more modest, yet still substantial, upside of +114.8% from its current price of $28.55. While both stocks offer considerable DCF-implied upside, BCS presents a dramatically higher potential return based on this intrinsic valuation method, clearly indicating that it is the cheaper stock from a fundamental perspective in the BCS vs ING valuation comparison.

BCS vs ING growth comparison

In the BCS vs ING growth comparison, both financial institutions face headwinds, as indicated by their recent year-over-year revenue figures. Barclays PLC (BCS) reported revenue growth of -10.9%, while ING Groep N.V. (ING) experienced a more significant decline of -65.3%. Although both figures are negative, BCS’s performance indicates a notably stronger resilience and a less severe contraction in its revenue base compared to ING. This suggests that BCS has managed to mitigate some of the broader market challenges more effectively, or its business segments are experiencing less pronounced negative impacts than those of ING. This relative strength is crucial for investors evaluating potential momentum.

Beyond top-line revenue, BCS also demonstrates stronger operational efficiency that could translate into future growth stability. BCS boasts a net margin of 17.81% and an EBITDA margin of 24.14%, both superior to ING’s net margin of 15.41% and EBITDA margin of 22.24%. While direct “forward estimates” for revenue growth are not explicitly provided in the data, the better margin profile of BCS implies a more robust underlying business that can convert revenue into profit more efficiently. This suggests BCS could potentially achieve stronger profitability momentum once market conditions stabilize or improve, distinguishing it as the one with stronger relative momentum despite the negative growth environment.

BCS vs ING profitability

When examining BCS vs ING profitability, Barclays PLC (BCS) exhibits a more robust financial performance as of 2026-05-03. BCS commands a net margin of 17.81%, indicating that it converts a larger percentage of its revenue into net income compared to ING Groep N.V. (ING), which has a net margin of 15.41%. This higher net margin for BCS suggests greater efficiency in managing costs and generating profit from its operations. Additionally, BCS’s EBITDA margin of 24.14% also surpasses ING’s 22.24%, further cementing its lead in operational profitability.

Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield is another critical measure of a company’s ability to generate cash, and here BCS significantly outperforms ING. Barclays PLC showcases an impressive FCF yield of 28.54%, indicating substantial cash generation relative to its market capitalization. In stark contrast, ING Groep N.V. reports an FCF yield of 0%, suggesting that it is not currently generating free cash flow at the same level as BCS. While return on equity (ROE) is not available for either company, BCS’s superior net and EBITDA margins, coupled with its strong FCF yield, clearly point to it being the company that generates more cash and is generally more profitable in this comparison.

Analyst ratings: BCS vs ING

Analysts covering both Barclays PLC (BCS) and ING Groep N.V. (ING) share a ‘Buy’ consensus, yet their individual confidence and price targets differ significantly. For BCS, a substantial 75.0% of the 24 analysts covering the stock recommend a ‘Buy’ rating. Their consensus price target for BCS stands at $44, representing an impressive upside potential of +87.8% from its current price of $23.43. This strong endorsement and high projected return highlight a bullish sentiment towards Barclays, suggesting analysts see considerable value and growth opportunities in the stock.

In contrast, while ING Groep N.V. also holds a ‘Buy’ consensus, the level of conviction among analysts is notably lower, and the price target indicates a potential downside. Of the 17 analysts covering ING, 64.7% recommend a ‘Buy’. However, their consensus price target is $22.5, which implies a downside of -21.2% from its current price of $28.55. This suggests that a significant portion of analysts believe ING is currently overvalued, despite the overall ‘Buy’ consensus being maintained by a smaller majority. Therefore, based on both the percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings and the implied price target upside, analysts clearly prefer BCS over ING in terms of future performance potential.

Should I buy BCS or ING stock in 2026?

Deciding whether should you buy BCS or ING stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s specific objectives and risk tolerance. For growth-oriented investors, BCS appears to present a more compelling case. Despite both companies facing revenue declines, BCS’s -10.9% reduction is significantly less severe than ING’s -65.3%, indicating better operational resilience and potentially a stronger foundation for recovery or future growth acceleration. Furthermore, BCS’s superior net and EBITDA margins suggest a more efficient business model capable of better converting revenue into profit when growth eventually returns. Its higher analyst buy rating and substantial price target upside also point to a more optimistic growth outlook among professional analysts.

For value investors, BCS also emerges as the stronger candidate. It trades at a more attractive valuation with a P/E ratio of 8.21x and a P/B ratio of 0.78x, making it cheaper relative to its earnings and book value compared to ING’s P/E of 11.13x and P/B of 1.41x. Crucially, BCS’s discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis reveals a staggering +382.2% implied upside, far surpassing ING’s +114.8%. This deep undervaluation by fundamental metrics positions BCS as a potentially lucrative opportunity for those seeking to capitalize on mispriced assets, offering significant potential returns if the market eventually recognizes its intrinsic value. Investors focusing on BCS vs ING fundamentals and valuation will likely favor BCS.

For income-focused investors, the choice between BCS and ING for dividend yield is less clear-cut, as both offer modest payouts. ING currently provides a slightly higher dividend yield of 0.05% compared to BCS’s 0.02%. However, given that both yields are extremely low, neither stock stands out as a strong income play. Investors prioritizing substantial dividend income might need to look beyond these two banks. Considering the overall financial health, valuation, and analyst sentiment, BCS generally appears to be the more favorable investment opportunity for a blend of value and potential growth, while ING shows a very small advantage purely on dividend yield. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.

More BCS and ING comparisons

BCS full stock analysis · ING full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: BCS vs ING