How this ANET vs UBER comparison is calculated

All metrics are based on trailing twelve months (TTM) financial data, consensus analyst estimates, and standardized valuation ratios. Data is sourced from Financial Modeling Prep and SEC EDGAR. Figures are normalized to ensure a fair comparison between Arista Networks, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. Analyst price targets and ratings are aggregated from Wall Street consensus as of 2026-05-16.

Quick verdict: Arista Networks, Inc. vs Uber Technologies, Inc. in 2026

Arista Networks, Inc. emerges as the growth leader, showcasing superior topline expansion and impressive operational efficiency. Conversely, Uber Technologies, Inc. presents a more attractive valuation profile and garners slightly stronger analyst conviction regarding potential upside. ANET demonstrates robust margin leadership, converting a higher percentage of its revenue into profit, while UBER offers a compelling free cash flow yield and substantial DCF upside. Not investment advice.

Arista Networks, Inc. vs Uber Technologies, Inc.: key metrics side by side

A full side-by-side look at Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) across earnings multiples, profitability, revenue momentum, and analyst sentiment — data updated 2026-05-16.

Relative valuation: ANET vs UBER

When assessing the relative valuation between Arista Networks, Inc. and UBER, a significant divergence in market multiples becomes immediately apparent. ANET, a dominant player in high-performance networking, trades at a premium earnings multiple of 47.99 times trailing earnings. This elevated price-to-earnings gap reflects strong investor confidence in its future growth prospects and robust profitability. Its price-to-book ratio stands at 13.24x, suggesting a substantial premium over its book value, indicative of strong intangible assets and market position. However, based on current consensus data, the discounted cash flow (DCF) model for Arista Networks, Inc. suggests an intrinsic value of $80.09, implying a significant -43.6% downside from its current share price.

In stark contrast, Uber Technologies, Inc. appears to offer a more fundamentally discounted entry point for investors. UBER commands an earnings multiple of just 18.04 times, which is considerably lower than Arista Networks, Inc. This more modest valuation in terms of price-to-earnings makes Uber Technologies, Inc. look like the more attractive option from a pure value perspective. Furthermore, its price-to-book multiple is 6.23x, also substantially lower than that of ANET. The DCF analysis for Uber Technologies, Inc. points to an intrinsic value of $139.82 per share, indicating an impressive potential upside of +86.2%. This suggests that Uber Technologies, Inc. stock could be significantly undervalued by the market, carrying a substantial fundamental discount compared to its calculated intrinsic worth.

Revenue momentum: Arista Networks, Inc. vs Uber Technologies, Inc.

Arista Networks, Inc. exhibits a more vigorous topline expansion compared to its ride-sharing counterpart. The networking equipment provider recorded a commendable revenue growth rate of +28.6% year-over-year, significantly outstripping Uber Technologies, Inc.’s +18.3%. This superior sales trajectory for ANET underscores its strong position within the evolving cloud and data center infrastructure market, where demand for high-speed, low-latency networking solutions remains robust. Furthermore, Arista Networks, Inc.’s operational efficiency, highlighted by its impressive EBITDA margin of 43.4%, suggests that this revenue momentum is translating into substantial underlying profitability.

On the other hand, while UBER’s 18.3% revenue growth represents a healthy expansion for a company of its scale, with trailing twelve-month revenue reaching $52.02 billion, it trails the more agile growth pace of ANET. Uber Technologies, Inc.’s lower EBITDA margin of 10.9% indicates a different operational model, characterized by higher variable costs inherent in its platform-based service delivery. While the current gap in revenue momentum is clear, it is important to acknowledge that this gap may not persist indefinitely if market conditions or strategic initiatives shift for either company, impacting their respective forward estimates. However, based on the most recent data, Arista Networks, Inc. clearly shows a stronger growth trajectory in terms of percentage change.

Profitability and cash generation: ANET vs UBER

In terms of pure profitability, Arista Networks, Inc. demonstrates a significantly higher efficiency in converting sales into earnings. ANET boasts an impressive net margin of 38.32%, indicating that a substantial portion of its revenue flows directly to the bottom line. This robust net income generation is a testament to its strong pricing power, cost management, and the high-value nature of its technology offerings. While a return on equity (ROE) figure for Arista Networks, Inc. is currently unavailable (N/A%), its high net margin and 43.4% EBITDA margin clearly position it as a leader in operational efficiency.

Conversely, Uber Technologies, Inc. operates with a more modest net margin of 15.91%, reflecting the competitive landscape and operational complexities inherent in its ride-hailing and delivery services. Despite a lower margin profile, Uber Technologies, Inc. exhibits a stronger free cash flow yield of 6.41% compared to ANET’s 2.95%. This superior cash conversion capability means UBER generates more cash relative to its market capitalization, which can be an attractive feature for investors focused on financial liquidity and real cash returns. Similar to ANET, Uber Technologies, Inc. also has an N/A% for its ROE, preventing a direct comparison on that specific metric.

Wall Street view: Arista Networks, Inc. vs Uber Technologies, Inc. analyst ratings

The professional outlook from Wall Street analysts for Arista Networks, Inc. remains largely positive, with a strong ‘Buy’ consensus. Out of 52 analysts covering ANET, 75.0% have issued a buy rating, underscoring collective confidence in its continued performance. The average price target for Arista Networks, Inc. is set at $183.3, which implies an upside potential of +29.1% from its current trading price. This analyst consensus often reflects expectations for sustained demand in enterprise networking and cloud infrastructure, driving future earnings growth.

Uber Technologies, Inc. also enjoys a highly favorable Wall Street sentiment, even slightly outperforming ANET in terms of analyst conviction. With 61 analysts providing coverage, a higher percentage of 81.9% have assigned a buy rating to UBER. The consensus price objective for Uber Technologies, Inc. stands at $102.9, suggesting a substantial upside potential of +37.0%. This indicates that analysts foresee greater market appreciation for UBER, possibly stemming from its expanding ecosystem of services and increasing operational leverage. It’s worth noting that these price targets may vary depending on future estimate revisions and shifts in market conditions.

Which investor profile fits ANET vs UBER?

For the growth-oriented investor, Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) presents a compelling case. With a revenue growth rate of +28.6%, it demonstrates robust topline expansion, indicating a dynamic business with strong market penetration in its niche. Its high net margin of 38.32% and impressive EBITDA margin of 43.4% suggest not just growth, but also highly efficient and profitable growth, which is often a hallmark of successful technology companies. While it trades at a premium valuation, investors focused on aggressive expansion and superior operational leverage may find ANET more aligned with their portfolio objectives, especially given its strong position in critical data center and cloud networking segments.

Conversely, the value-seeking individual might find Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) to be the more attractive option. UBER trades at a considerably lower earnings multiple of 18.04x compared to ANET’s 47.99x, and its price-to-book multiple of 6.23x is also significantly more appealing. The most striking argument for value in Uber Technologies, Inc. comes from its discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, which projects an intrinsic value of $139.82, representing a massive +86.2% upside potential. This contrasts sharply with ANET’s DCF indicating a -43.6% downside. For those prioritizing a favorable entry point and a substantial fundamental discount, UBER appears to offer a stronger proposition for capital gains based on intrinsic value.

For an income-focused portfolio, neither Arista Networks, Inc. nor Uber Technologies, Inc. currently serves as an ideal choice. Both companies maintain a dividend yield of 0%, indicating that they reinvest all earnings back into the business for growth rather than distributing them to shareholders as cash dividends. This strategy is common among growth-stage technology companies or those in expansion phases. Therefore, investors primarily seeking regular dividend income should look elsewhere, as ANET and UBER are clearly oriented towards capital appreciation rather than recurring payouts. This is not investment advice. Always do your own research.

More Arista Networks, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. comparisons

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) full stock analysis · Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) full stock analysis · All stock comparisons