ADSK vs CRWV Stock Comparison 2026 | Alert Invest









ADSK
vs
CRWV
Updated 2026-04-03

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CRWV): Stock Comparison 2026

ADSK price$238.08
ADSK target$341.45
CRWV price$82.24
CRWV target$111.36
SectorTechnology

Quick verdict: ADSK vs CRWV in 2026

In this ADSK vs CRWV stock comparison 2026, Autodesk (ADSK) holds the overall edge based on a majority of fundamental and valuation metrics, particularly excelling in profitability and analyst sentiment. CoreWeave (CRWV) stands out as the undisputed growth leader, boasting significantly higher revenue expansion, while also presenting lower valuation multiples for those willing to accept higher risk. ADSK demonstrates superior margins, while analysts show greater conviction and projected upside for Autodesk. Not investment advice.

Best for Growth: CRWV
Best for Value: CRWV (High Risk)
Best for Income: Neither

ADSK vs CRWV: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of ADSK and CRWV across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-04-03.

ADSK7 wins
vs
CRWV4 wins
MetricADSKCRWV
Revenue (TTM)$7.21B$5.13B
Revenue growth YoY17.5%167.9% CRWV wins
Gross margin91.98% ADSK wins71.68%
Net margin15.6% ADSK wins-22.74%
EBITDA margin24.23%48.11% CRWV wins
ROEN/A%N/A%
FCF yield4.76% ADSK wins-16.77%
P/E ratio44.9x-30.66x CRWV wins
P/B ratio16.58x10.73x CRWV wins
Debt / equity0.9x ADSK wins4.54x
Dividend yield0%0%
Buy rating %76.5% ADSK wins56.0%
Analyst consensusBuyBuy
Price target upside+43.4% ADSK wins+35.4%
DCF upside-46.5% ADSK wins-267.0%
FMP ratingB-D+
Overall edge: ADSK leads on 7 of 11 comparable metrics.

ADSK vs CRWV valuation comparison

When examining the ADSK vs CRWV valuation, the picture is complex, reflecting different stages of business maturity. Autodesk (ADSK) trades at a P/E ratio of 44.9x, indicating a premium valuation for its established profitability and market position. Its Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio stands at 16.58x, suggesting that investors are willing to pay a significant multiple over its book value, likely due to intangible assets and strong brand equity. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model suggests ADSK is overvalued by 46.5%, implying a current price significantly above its intrinsic value based on future cash flows.

In contrast, CoreWeave (CRWV) presents lower headline valuation multiples, winning on P/E and P/B in our scorecard, but these numbers require careful interpretation. CRWV has a negative P/E ratio of -30.66x, which indicates the company is currently unprofitable. While a negative P/E might numerically appear “lower,” it signifies losses rather than traditional undervaluation, posing a higher risk. Its P/B ratio of 10.73x is lower than ADSK’s, but still substantial for a company that isn’t generating positive net income. Crucially, CRWV’s DCF analysis points to a massive overvaluation of 267.0%, highlighting significant skepticism from this model regarding its current market capitalization relative to its projected future cash flows, especially given its unprofitability and high debt. Therefore, while CRWV might appear “cheaper” on some multiples, its deep unprofitability and challenging DCF make ADSK’s more robust valuation profile more appealing despite its higher P/E.

ADSK vs CRWV growth comparison

In terms of growth, CoreWeave (CRWV) is an undeniable leader, exhibiting hyper-growth that sets it apart in this ADSK vs CRWV stock comparison 2026. CRWV reported a staggering Year-over-Year revenue growth of 167.9%, a testament to its rapid expansion in the high-demand sectors it serves, likely driven by AI and specialized cloud infrastructure. This explosive growth is a primary attraction for investors seeking aggressive capital appreciation, indicating strong market traction and successful scaling in a nascent but rapidly expanding industry.

Autodesk (ADSK), while also demonstrating solid growth, operates at a more mature stage. ADSK posted a revenue growth of 17.5%, which is a respectable figure for a company with $7.21 billion in revenue and a strong foothold in the design and engineering software market. While not matching CRWV’s astronomical pace, ADSK’s consistent growth underscores its durable business model and continued relevance in professional software. Looking at these figures, CRWV clearly possesses stronger momentum and offers a higher growth potential for investors, albeit with the inherent risks associated with early-stage, fast-growing companies that are not yet profitable.

ADSK vs CRWV profitability

Analyzing the ADSK vs CRWV fundamentals and valuation, particularly profitability, reveals a stark contrast. Autodesk (ADSK) stands as a highly profitable enterprise, boasting a robust net margin of 15.6%. This indicates its strong ability to convert revenue into actual profit, a hallmark of a mature and efficient software business. Furthermore, ADSK generates significant free cash flow, as evidenced by its FCF yield of 4.76%, showcasing its financial health and capacity for self-funding or shareholder returns. Its EBITDA margin is a solid 24.23%, reflecting strong operational efficiency before accounting for depreciation, amortization, interest, and taxes.

CoreWeave (CRWV), on the other hand, is currently operating at a loss, with a net margin of -22.74%. This unprofitability is typical for high-growth companies aggressively investing in expansion and infrastructure, but it represents a higher risk profile for investors. Despite the negative net margin, CRWV reports an impressive EBITDA margin of 48.11%, which is significantly higher than ADSK’s. This suggests strong gross operational efficiency and pricing power, but these gains are eroded by substantial non-operating expenses, depreciation, or interest costs further down the income statement. The company’s Free Cash Flow yield of -16.77% also indicates that it is consuming cash to fuel its growth rather than generating it, requiring external financing. Both companies have an N/A% ROE, preventing a direct comparison on that metric. Ultimately, ADSK clearly demonstrates superior profitability and cash generation capabilities compared to CRWV.

Analyst ratings: ADSK vs CRWV

When evaluating analyst sentiment for the ADSK vs CRWV stock comparison 2026, Autodesk (ADSK) receives a noticeably stronger endorsement from the investment community. Out of 51 analysts covering ADSK, a substantial 76.5% recommend it as a “Buy,” reflecting high confidence in its future performance. The consensus price target for ADSK is $341.45, which implies a significant upside of +43.4% from its current price of $238.08, further underlining analysts’ optimistic outlook for the company. This strong consensus suggests a belief in ADSK’s sustained market leadership and financial stability.

CoreWeave (CRWV) also garners a “Buy” consensus rating, but with less widespread conviction. Among the 25 analysts covering CRWV, 56.0% have a “Buy” rating, which, while positive, is considerably lower than ADSK’s percentage. The average analyst price target for CRWV is $111.36, indicating an upside of +35.4% from its current price of $82.24. Although this represents a healthy potential return, it trails ADSK’s projected upside. The slightly lower percentage of “Buy” ratings and less aggressive price target upside suggest analysts might be more cautious about CRWV’s rapid growth trajectory and current unprofitability, balancing its high potential with inherent risks.

Should I buy ADSK or CRWV stock in 2026?

The decision of should I buy ADSK or CRWV stock in 2026 depends heavily on an investor’s risk tolerance and investment objectives. For growth-oriented investors with a high appetite for risk, CoreWeave (CRWV) presents a compelling, albeit speculative, opportunity. Its exceptional 167.9% revenue growth positions it as a leader in a burgeoning technology sector, promising significant upside if it can successfully scale and achieve profitability. However, investors must be comfortable with its current unprofitability, negative free cash flow, high debt-to-equity ratio of 4.54x, and highly negative DCF valuation.

For investors prioritizing stability, established profitability, and a more robust financial footing, Autodesk (ADSK) appears to be the more suitable choice. While its 17.5% revenue growth is more modest compared to CRWV, it is consistent for a company with $7.21 billion in revenue and a 15.6% net margin. ADSK also boasts positive free cash flow, a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.9x, and a more favorable DCF valuation, despite its premium P/E ratio of 44.9x. Analysts also show greater consensus and upside potential for ADSK, making it a more conservative growth play.

For income-focused investors, neither ADSK nor CRWV would be a suitable addition to a portfolio, as both companies currently have a 0% dividend yield. Therefore, the choice between these two technology stocks boils down to whether an investor prefers the high-risk, high-reward potential of hyper-growth (CRWV) or the more stable, profitable, and analyst-favored growth of an established market leader (ADSK). This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.

Alert Invest · Free Newsletter

Get alerts when top investors buy a stock!

Track when institutional investors and analysts change positions on ADSK and CRWV. Free, every week.

  • Institutional & insider moves
  • Analyst upgrades & downgrades
  • 100% free — unsubscribe anytime

Get free investor alerts →

FAQ: ADSK vs CRWV

Is ADSK or CRWV a better stock in 2026?

ADSK offers established profitability (P/E 44.9x, net margin 15.6%) and strong analyst backing (76.5% buy ratings). CRWV, while unprofitable (P/E -30.66x, net margin -22.74%), offers significantly higher revenue growth (167.9% YoY) and lower P/B (10.73x). The “better” stock depends on an investor’s risk tolerance and preference for stable profitability versus high-growth potential. Not investment advice.

Which has more analyst upside — ADSK or CRWV?

ADSK has a consensus target price of $341.45, implying an upside of +43.4%. CRWV has a consensus target of $111.36, indicating an upside of +35.4%. As of 2026-04-03, ADSK shows greater projected upside according to analysts. Not a prediction by Alert Invest.

Which is growing faster — ADSK or CRWV?

ADSK’s revenue growth is 17.5% YoY, while CRWV’s revenue growth is 167.9% YoY. CoreWeave (CRWV) is currently growing significantly faster than Autodesk (ADSK).

Which is more profitable — ADSK or CRWV?

ADSK’s net margin is 15.6% and its FCF yield is 4.76%. CRWV’s net margin is -22.74% and its FCF yield is -16.77%. Autodesk (ADSK) is significantly more profitable and generates positive free cash flow, whereas CoreWeave (CRWV) is currently unprofitable and consumes cash.

Do ADSK or CRWV pay dividends?

ADSK’s dividend yield is 0%. CRWV’s dividend yield is 0%. Neither Autodesk nor CoreWeave currently pay dividends.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. Data: Financial Modeling Prep & SEC EDGAR. Always do your own research.