Quick verdict: CRWV vs FTNT in 2026

For investors navigating the technology sector in 2026, Fortinet (FTNT) holds an overall edge, demonstrating stronger profitability and a more favorable valuation profile according to our analysis. While CoreWeave (CRWV) is the undeniable growth leader with impressive revenue expansion, Fortinet takes the lead in critical areas such as net margins and free cash flow generation, and also shows less downside to its target price. Analysts show a higher ‘Buy’ conviction for CRWV, yet FTNT presents positive DCF upside, making it appear more appealing from a current fundamental valuation perspective. Not investment advice.

CRWV vs FTNT: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of CRWV and FTNT across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-07.

CRWV vs FTNT valuation comparison

When considering CRWV vs FTNT valuation in 2026, the metrics present two very different investment profiles. CoreWeave (CRWV) trades with a negative P/E ratio of -51.43x, reflecting its current unprofitability, which can be typical for high-growth companies aggressively investing in expansion. Its Price/Book ratio stands at 18.0x. In contrast, Fortinet (FTNT) commands a positive P/E ratio of 34.0x and a significantly higher P/B ratio of 67.15x, indicative of a mature, profitable technology company with a strong brand and established asset base. While CRWV’s lower P/B might initially seem attractive, its negative earnings highlight the speculative nature of its current valuation, heavily relying on future growth and profitability.

Further scrutinizing the valuation using a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model reveals a stark contrast. FTNT shows a positive DCF upside of +11.3%, suggesting that its current price is below its intrinsic value based on future cash flow projections. Conversely, CRWV’s DCF registers a deeply negative value of $-516.09, implying a staggering -474.0% downside from its current share price according to this valuation method. This suggests CRWV is significantly overvalued by traditional intrinsic value assessments, highlighting a high-risk, high-reward proposition where its current price is largely driven by market sentiment and future growth expectations rather than immediate financial performance. Therefore, for investors seeking a more conservatively valued stock with potential upside based on fundamentals, FTNT appears to be the clearer choice in the CRWV vs FTNT valuation analysis.

CRWV vs FTNT growth comparison

In a direct CRWV vs FTNT growth comparison, CoreWeave (CRWV) stands out as an aggressive growth powerhouse, expanding its revenue by a remarkable +167.9% year-over-year to $5.13 billion. This explosive growth underscores its position in a rapidly expanding sector, likely driven by significant demand for specialized cloud infrastructure and AI compute. Such high growth rates often come at the expense of immediate profitability, a characteristic evident in CRWV’s negative net margin but partially offset by a robust EBITDA margin of 48.11%, indicating strong operational efficiency before taxes and other expenses.

Fortinet (FTNT), while still growing, exhibits a more moderate and sustainable revenue growth rate of +14.2% year-over-year, reaching $6.80 billion. As a leader in cybersecurity, FTNT operates in a stable yet competitive market. Its growth, though not as dramatic as CRWV’s, is consistent with a mature technology company that prioritizes profitability alongside expansion. FTNT’s EBITDA margin of 34.8% is healthy, but CRWV’s higher EBITDA margin suggests superior operational leverage in its business model, assuming it can translate that to net profitability in the future. For investors focused on sheer top-line expansion and market disruption, CRWV demonstrates significantly stronger momentum, making it a compelling option for those prioritizing revenue growth.

CRWV vs FTNT profitability

Analyzing CRWV vs FTNT profitability reveals Fortinet (FTNT) as the clear leader in generating positive earnings and cash flow. FTNT boasts an impressive net margin of 27.49%, demonstrating its ability to convert a substantial portion of its revenue into profit. This high level of profitability is characteristic of established software and cybersecurity companies with strong recurring revenue and efficient cost structures. Its Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of 3.66% further solidifies its position as a financially robust company, indicating healthy cash generation relative to its market capitalization.

CoreWeave (CRWV), on the other hand, reports a net margin of -22.74%, signifying that it is currently operating at a loss. While this is not uncommon for companies in hyper-growth phases, it highlights the inherent risks associated with its current business model. CRWV’s FCF yield is also negative at -10.0%, indicating that it is consuming cash rather than generating it from its operations. Both companies report ‘N/A%’ for Return on Equity (ROE), which means this metric cannot be used for direct comparison. Despite CRWV’s higher EBITDA margin of 48.11% compared to FTNT’s 34.8%, its inability to translate operational efficiency into net profit and positive free cash flow underscores the significant difference in their profitability profiles, with FTNT clearly generating more sustainable cash and earnings.

Analyst ratings: CRWV vs FTNT

When examining analyst ratings for CRWV vs FTNT, there’s a distinct difference in sentiment. CoreWeave (CRWV) has 27 analysts covering the stock, with 59.3% issuing a ‘Buy’ rating, leading to a consensus of ‘Buy’. This high conviction among analysts, despite CRWV’s current unprofitability and negative valuation metrics, suggests a strong belief in its future potential, particularly in the burgeoning AI infrastructure market. However, their consensus price target of $120.65 implies a -12.6% downside from its current price of $137.98, signaling a potential disconnect between optimistic long-term views and near-term price expectations.

Fortinet (FTNT) is covered by a larger cohort of 68 analysts, with 44.1% recommending a ‘Buy’, resulting in a consensus rating of ‘Hold’. This more cautious stance is typical for a mature company that has experienced significant growth and is now valued fairly or slightly above fair value. FTNT’s consensus price target of $87.59 indicates a more modest -2.6% downside from its current price of $89.95, which is considerably less severe than CRWV’s implied downside. While FTNT’s ‘Buy’ percentage is lower, the smaller implied downside to its target price and positive DCF upside of +11.3% suggest a more stable and potentially less risky investment from an analyst perspective, emphasizing the importance of crwv vs ftnt fundamentals and valuation.

Should I buy CRWV or FTNT stock in 2026?

For investors prioritizing aggressive top-line expansion and significant market disruption, CoreWeave (CRWV) presents a compelling, albeit high-risk, opportunity in 2026. Its astounding +167.9% year-over-year revenue growth makes it a standout choice for growth-focused portfolios aiming for exponential returns in the specialized cloud and AI infrastructure sectors. However, this potential comes with substantial risk, as evidenced by its negative net margin of -22.74% and deeply negative DCF valuation, indicating that its current price is heavily reliant on future speculative growth rather than present profitability. Investors should weigh the potential for massive returns against the inherent volatility and lack of current profitability when considering if they should buy CRWV stock.

Conversely, if your investment strategy leans towards stability, proven profitability, and more conservative valuation, Fortinet (FTNT) is likely the better choice for your portfolio in 2026. FTNT, with its robust net margin of 27.49% and positive free cash flow yield of 3.66%, offers a strong foundation as a leader in cybersecurity. Its P/E ratio of 34.0x and positive DCF upside of +11.3% suggest a reasonably valued company with intrinsic growth potential, providing a more predictable investment trajectory. FTNT caters to investors looking for steady, reliable performance from a well-established technology firm, making it attractive for those asking should I buy FTNT stock.

Regarding income potential, neither CRWV nor FTNT currently offers a dividend yield, with both stocks at 0%. Therefore, for investors seeking regular income from their stock holdings, neither of these technology companies would be suitable in 2026. The decision on should I buy CRWV or FTNT stock in 2026 ultimately hinges on an investor’s risk tolerance and investment objectives – whether chasing hyper-growth and market disruption with CRWV or seeking stability and established profitability with FTNT. This is not investment advice; always conduct thorough personal research.

More CRWV and FTNT comparisons

CRWV full stock analysis · FTNT full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: CRWV vs FTNT