Quick verdict: GTM vs MANH in 2026

Manhattan Associates (MANH) appears to have the overall edge, leading in key areas such as revenue growth, profitability margins, and analyst sentiment, according to the latest data from 2026-05-04. Growth leader: MANH. Value leader: MANH. Margin leader: MANH. Analyst favourite: MANH. Most upside: MANH. Not investment advice.

GTM vs MANH: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of GTM and MANH across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-04.

GTM vs MANH valuation comparison

When considering the GTM vs MANH valuation, the two companies present strikingly different profiles. ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) trades with a P/E ratio of 0x and a P/B ratio of 0x, suggesting that the company is currently unprofitable or has minimal earnings/book value relative to its market capitalization of $1.98 billion. Despite this, GTM’s discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis points to a substantial upside of +539.7% from its current price of $6.5094, indicating significant future value potential according to this model.

In contrast, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) trades at a much higher valuation, with a P/E ratio of 38.76x and a P/B ratio of 40.93x, reflecting its solid profitability and market confidence with a market cap of $8.33 billion. However, MANH’s DCF analysis shows a downside of -33.4% from its current price of $140.7099. Based purely on these valuation multiples and the DCF model, GTM appears to be significantly cheaper and potentially undervalued compared to MANH, which trades at a premium. Investors seeking value might find GTM’s current valuation more attractive, especially given its projected DCF upside.

GTM vs MANH growth comparison

In the GTM vs MANH growth comparison, Manhattan Associates exhibits slightly stronger revenue momentum. MANH reported a year-over-year revenue growth of +3.7%, outpacing GTM’s revenue growth of +2.9%. While both companies are experiencing growth, MANH’s slightly higher rate, coupled with its robust profitability metrics, suggests a more established and efficiently growing business. MANH’s revenue for the trailing twelve months stands at $1.08 billion, compared to GTM’s $1.25 billion, demonstrating GTM’s larger current revenue base despite slower growth.

Beyond top-line growth, profitability margins offer further insight into growth quality. MANH boasts impressive net margins of 19.68% and EBITDA margins of 26.61%, which are indicators of healthy, sustainable growth. In stark contrast, GTM currently reports 0% for both net margin and EBITDA margin, implying current unprofitability or minimal earnings generation, which could pose challenges for reinvestment and future growth without external funding. Analysts also show greater conviction in MANH, with a ‘Buy’ consensus compared to GTM’s ‘Hold’, further indicating MANH’s stronger momentum and growth prospects in the eyes of the market.

GTM vs MANH profitability

When analyzing GTM vs MANH profitability, Manhattan Associates (MANH) stands out with significantly stronger financial performance. MANH demonstrates robust margins with a net margin of 19.68% and an EBITDA margin of 26.61%. These figures highlight MANH’s efficiency in converting revenue into profit, reflecting a mature and well-managed operation within the technology sector. The company’s ability to maintain high profitability, even with a competitive revenue growth rate of 3.7%, underscores its operational excellence.

Conversely, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) currently reports a net margin of 0% and an EBITDA margin of 0%. This indicates that GTM is either operating at or near breakeven, or experiencing losses, which directly impacts its current profitability. While neither company provides a definitive ROE percentage (N/A%), GTM does show a superior Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield of 19.58% compared to MANH’s 4.57%. This suggests that GTM is generating a higher amount of cash relative to its market capitalization despite its lack of accounting profits, indicating strong cash flow generation capabilities, which could be an important factor for investors focused on cash returns.

Analyst ratings: GTM vs MANH

The analyst community shows a clear preference in their ratings for GTM vs MANH. Manhattan Associates (MANH) is highly favored, with 73.3% of the 15 analysts covering the stock issuing a ‘Buy’ rating. The consensus among analysts for MANH is a strong ‘Buy’, with an average price target of $197.25, representing a potential upside of +40.2% from its current price of $140.7099. This strong backing indicates significant confidence in MANH’s future performance and growth trajectory.

For ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM), the sentiment is more cautious. Out of 27 analysts, only 33.3% recommend a ‘Buy’ rating, leading to an overall ‘Hold’ consensus. The average price target for GTM is $8.95, which suggests a potential upside of +37.5% from its current price of $6.5094. While GTM also offers potential upside according to analysts, the lower percentage of ‘Buy’ ratings and the ‘Hold’ consensus suggest a less enthusiastic outlook compared to MANH, reflecting possibly higher risks or a more uncertain path to growth and profitability.

Should I buy GTM or MANH stock in 2026?

For growth investors in 2026, Manhattan Associates (MANH) presents a compelling case. With slightly higher revenue growth of +3.7% and robust profitability margins (Net Margin: 19.68%, EBITDA Margin: 26.61%), MANH demonstrates a more established and efficient growth engine. The strong analyst consensus of ‘Buy’ and a higher price target upside of +40.2% further solidify its position for those prioritizing consistent growth and positive earnings.

Value investors, however, might find ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) more intriguing, despite its current unprofitability. GTM trades at a P/E of 0x and P/B of 0x, which, while indicating no current profits or book value, could signal significant undervaluation if the company turns profitable. The DCF model projects an impressive +539.7% upside for GTM, suggesting considerable long-term potential not yet reflected in its market price. This significant upside and low multiples could appeal to investors with a higher risk tolerance seeking substantial returns from a turnaround or growth story.

Neither GTM nor MANH are suitable choices for income-focused investors in 2026, as both companies currently have a dividend yield of 0%. Both are growth-oriented technology companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings back into the business rather than distributing them as dividends. Investors looking for regular income streams would need to explore other investment opportunities. This is not investment advice.

More GTM and MANH comparisons

GTM full stock analysis · MANH full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: GTM vs MANH