Quick verdict: CAMT vs ONTO in 2026

In a head-to-head `CAMT vs ONTO stock comparison 2026`, Onto Innovation (ONTO) generally holds the overall edge, leading in a majority of the key financial metrics, particularly in valuation and analyst sentiment. Camtek (CAMT) stands out as the growth leader with its significantly higher revenue growth, while ONTO appears to be the value leader based on its P/E and P/B ratios. Although CAMT boasts a stronger EBITDA margin, ONTO has a slight edge in net margin and a positive free cash flow yield. ONTO is also the clear analyst favourite, displaying considerable upside potential compared to CAMT’s current target. Not investment advice.

CAMT vs ONTO: key metrics side by side

Full side-by-side comparison of CAMT and ONTO across valuation, profitability, growth and analyst sentiment. Data updated 2026-05-08.

CAMT vs ONTO valuation comparison

When assessing the `CAMT vs ONTO valuation` in 2026, Onto Innovation (ONTO) appears to trade at a more favorable valuation compared to Camtek (CAMT), despite both exhibiting high multiples typical for growth-oriented technology stocks. ONTO’s trailing P/E ratio stands at 128.16x, significantly lower than CAMT’s P/E of 173.97x. Similarly, ONTO boasts a more attractive Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 6.4x, which is less than half of CAMT’s P/B ratio of 14.3x. These metrics suggest that investors are paying a premium for CAMT’s earnings and assets relative to ONTO.

Both companies exhibit substantial implied overvaluation based on their Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models, with CAMT’s DCF indicating an -80.5% downside and ONTO’s a -78.1% downside. While both figures are negative, ONTO’s DCF implies a slightly less extreme overvaluation. From a pure valuation standpoint, ONTO presents a comparatively cheaper option, offering a lower entry multiple for its earnings and book value within the current market environment. This could be a critical factor for investors focusing on `CAMT vs ONTO fundamentals and valuation`.

CAMT vs ONTO growth comparison

In terms of growth, Camtek (CAMT) demonstrates significantly stronger momentum compared to Onto Innovation (ONTO). CAMT reported an impressive year-over-year revenue growth of 15.6%, which is substantially higher than ONTO’s modest 1.8% revenue growth. This indicates that CAMT is expanding its top line at a much faster pace, potentially capturing greater market share or benefiting from stronger demand in its specific segments of the technology sector. This robust growth rate could be a key consideration for investors prioritizing high-growth companies in the `camt vs onto stock comparison 2026`.

While CAMT leads in revenue growth, a closer look at profitability margins provides additional context. CAMT exhibits a superior EBITDA margin of 25.84%, compared to ONTO’s 17.26%. This suggests CAMT is more efficient at generating operating profit from its sales before accounting for non-operating expenses. However, ONTO’s net margin of 10.33% is marginally higher than CAMT’s 10.22%, indicating that ONTO might manage its interest, taxes, and other non-operating costs slightly more effectively to convert revenue into net income, despite its slower revenue expansion.

CAMT vs ONTO profitability

Delving into the profitability of CAMT vs ONTO, both companies maintain respectable net margins, with Onto Innovation (ONTO) holding a slight edge. ONTO’s net margin stands at 10.33%, marginally surpassing Camtek’s (CAMT) 10.22%. This indicates that ONTO is slightly more effective at converting its revenue into profit after all expenses, including taxes, are accounted for. However, CAMT’s EBITDA margin of 25.84% significantly outperforms ONTO’s 17.26%, suggesting that CAMT is more efficient at managing its core operational expenses before depreciation, amortization, interest, and taxes.

When examining Return on Equity (ROE), both companies currently report “N/A%”, indicating that this metric is either not applicable or not available in the provided data. This limits a direct comparison of how efficiently each company uses shareholder equity to generate profits. Regarding cash generation, ONTO demonstrates a free cash flow (FCF) yield of 1.75%, while CAMT has an FCF yield of 0%. This metric indicates that ONTO is generating positive free cash flow, which can be used for debt reduction, dividends, or reinvestment, whereas CAMT is currently not generating free cash flow. Therefore, in terms of cash generation, ONTO generates more cash relative to its market capitalization.

Analyst ratings: CAMT vs ONTO

The analyst community presents a clear preference in the `camt vs onto analyst ratings and recommendations`. For Camtek (CAMT), out of 13 analysts covering the stock, 76.9% currently issue a “Buy” rating. The consensus price target for CAMT is $165.6, which represents a -14.2% downside from its current price of $193.08. While a majority of analysts recommend buying CAMT, the implied downside from their collective target suggests a cautious outlook on its immediate price appreciation potential. The overall consensus remains “Buy,” but with a downward target adjustment.

In contrast, Onto Innovation (ONTO) enjoys unanimous support from analysts. All 11 analysts covering ONTO have issued a “Buy” rating, translating to a 100.0% buy rating percentage. The consensus price target for ONTO is $331.67, which indicates a robust +21.0% upside from its current price of $274.17. This strong analyst endorsement and significant projected upside clearly position ONTO as the analyst favourite between the two, suggesting greater confidence in its future performance and potential for capital appreciation in the near term.

Should I buy CAMT or ONTO stock in 2026?

The decision on `should I buy CAMT or ONTO stock in 2026` largely depends on your investment strategy and risk tolerance. For growth-oriented investors primarily seeking top-line expansion, Camtek (CAMT) might be the more appealing option. Its impressive 15.6% year-over-year revenue growth significantly outpaces Onto Innovation’s (ONTO) 1.8%, indicating stronger sales momentum and potentially faster market penetration. However, CAMT’s valuation multiples are considerably higher, which means investors are paying a premium for this growth. Its strong EBITDA margin also suggests efficient core operations.

For value investors or those more sensitive to valuation, Onto Innovation (ONTO) could be the preferred choice. ONTO trades at a lower P/E ratio of 128.16x and a much lower P/B ratio of 6.4x compared to CAMT’s 173.97x P/E and 14.3x P/B. Additionally, ONTO boasts a positive free cash flow yield of 1.75% and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0x, signaling a stronger financial position and more efficient cash generation. Analysts also show unanimous support for ONTO with a significant target price upside, suggesting a more favorable risk-reward profile from their perspective.

Neither CAMT nor ONTO are suitable for income investors, as both companies currently have a 0% dividend yield. Therefore, investors solely focused on generating regular income through dividends will need to look elsewhere. In summary, if you prioritize high revenue growth and operational efficiency (EBITDA margin), CAMT could be attractive despite its rich valuation. If you prioritize valuation, financial stability (low debt, positive FCF), and strong analyst sentiment with potential upside, ONTO presents a more compelling case. This is not investment advice; always conduct your own thorough research.

More CAMT and ONTO comparisons

CAMT full stock analysis · ONTO full stock analysis · All stock comparisons

FAQ: CAMT vs ONTO